Form 8-K
8-K — Ramaco Resources, Inc.
Accession: 0001213900-26-082907
Filed: 2026-07-29
Period: 2026-07-28
CIK: 0001687187
SIC: 1220 (BITUMINOUS COAL & LIGNITE MINING)
Item: Regulation FD Disclosure
Item: Financial Statements and Exhibits
Documents
8-K — ea0299533-8k_ramaco.htm (Primary)
EX-99.1 — RAMACO RESOURCES - BROOK MINE CRITICAL MINERALS PROJECT - INITIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT DATED JULY 28, 2026 (ea029953301ex99-1.htm)
EX-99.2 — SHAREHOLDER LETTER ISSUED BY RAMACO RESOURCES, INC. DATED JULY 29, 2026 (ea029953301ex99-2.htm)
EX-99.3 — PRESS RELEASE ISSUED BY RAMACO RESOURCES, INC. DATED JULY 29, 2026 (ea029953301ex99-3.htm)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img1.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img2.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img3.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img4.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img5.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img6.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img7.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img8.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img9.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img10.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img11.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img12.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img13.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img14.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img15.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img16.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img17.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img18.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img19.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img20.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img21.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img22.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img23.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img24.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img25.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img26.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img27.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img28.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img29.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img30.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img31.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img32.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img33.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img34.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img35.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img36.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img37.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img38.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img39.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img40.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img41.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img42.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img43.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img44.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img45.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img46.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img47.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img48.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img49.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img50.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img51.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img52.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img53.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img54.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img55.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img56.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img57.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img58.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img59.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img60.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img61.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img62.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img63.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img64.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img65.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img66.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img67.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img68.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img69.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img70.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img71.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-1img72.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-2img1.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-2img2.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-2img3.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-2img4.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-2img5.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-2img6.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-2img7.jpg)
GRAPHIC (ea029953301_ex99-3img1.jpg)
XML — IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT (R1.htm)
8-K — CURRENT REPORT
8-K (Primary)
Filename: ea0299533-8k_ramaco.htm · Sequence: 1
false
0001687187
0001687187
2026-07-28
2026-07-28
0001687187
METC:ClassCommonStockMember
2026-07-28
2026-07-28
0001687187
METC:ClassBCommonStockMember
2026-07-28
2026-07-28
0001687187
METC:Sec8.375SeniorNotesDue2029Member
2026-07-28
2026-07-28
0001687187
METC:Sec8.250SeniorNotesDue2030Member
2026-07-28
2026-07-28
iso4217:USD
xbrli:shares
iso4217:USD
xbrli:shares
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT
REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (date of earliest event reported): July 28, 2026
Ramaco Resources, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
001-38003
38-4018838
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
(Commission File Number)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
250 West Main Street, Suite 1900
Lexington, Kentucky 40507
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(859) 244-7455
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K
filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:
☐
Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
☐
Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act
(17 CFR 240.14a-12)
☐
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the
Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
☐
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the
Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b)
of the Act:
Title of each class
Trading Symbol(s)
Name of each exchange on which registered
Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par value
METC
Nasdaq Global Select Market
Class B Common Stock, $0.01 par value
METCB
Nasdaq Global Select Market
8.375% Senior Notes due 2029
METCZ
Nasdaq Global Select Market
8.250% Senior Notes due 2030
METCI
Nasdaq Global Select Market
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is
an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§ 230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).
Emerging growth company ☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check
mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting
standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Item
7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure.
On July 28, 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. (the
"Company") received from Hatch Associates Consultants, Inc. a conceptual study titled “Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
– Initial Assessment Report” relating to the Company’s exploratory Brook Mine rare earth and critical minerals project
(the “Hatch Report”). A copy of the Hatch Report is attached as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated
herein by reference.
On July 29, 2026, the Company issued a letter
to stockholders from its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Randall W. Atkins, regarding the latest developments at the Company’s
exploratory Brook Mine rare earth and critical minerals project (the “Shareholder Letter”). The Shareholder Letter discusses
the Hatch Report and the Company’s internal projections. A copy of the Shareholder Letter is attached as Exhibit 99.2 to this Current
Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated herein by reference.
On July 29, 2026, the Company issued a press release
(the “Press Release”), announcing that it has released the Hatch Report and posted the following to its website at www.ramacoresources.com:
● The Shareholder Letter;
● The Hatch Report; and
● A video presented during the Ramaco Research Rodeo.
A copy of the Press Release is attached as Exhibit
99.3 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated herein by reference.
The information furnished in this Current Report
on Form 8-K under Item 7.01, including Exhibits 99.1, 99.2, and 99.3 attached hereto, shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities
of that section, and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
“Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
Item
9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits
(d) Exhibits.
Exhibit
No.
Description
99.1
Ramaco Resources – Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project – Initial Assessment Report dated July 28, 2026
99.2
Shareholder Letter issued by Ramaco Resources, Inc. dated July 29, 2026
99.3
Press Release issued by Ramaco Resources, Inc. dated July 29, 2026
104
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL)
1
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
RAMACO RESOURCES, INC.
Date: July 29, 2026
By:
/s/ Randall W. Atkins
Randall W. Atkins
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
2
EX-99.1 — RAMACO RESOURCES - BROOK MINE CRITICAL MINERALS PROJECT - INITIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT DATED JULY 28, 2026
EX-99.1
Filename: ea029953301ex99-1.htm · Sequence: 2
Exhibit 99.1
This document contains the Hatch Associates Consultants, Inc. Report, as issued on July 28, 2026.
The report is the property of Ramaco Resources, Inc.
© Ramaco 2026 All rights reserved,
including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco
Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial
Assessment Report - July 28, 2026
Ramaco
Resources
Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial
Assessment Report
/s/ F. Delgado
2026-07-28
0
Issued
for Use
Various
Various
F.
Delgado
M.
Woloschuk
Date
Rev.
Status
Prepared
By
Checked
By
Approved
By
Approved
By
Client
H376597-0000-100-146-0002, Rev. 0
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - July 28, 2026
Table
of Contents
Section
1 – Introduction
Section
2 – Process Definition
Section
3 – Capital Cost Estimate
Section
4 – Operating Cost Estimate
Section
5 – Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule
Section
6 – Project Risk and Opportunities
H376597-0000-100-146-0002, Rev. 0
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 1 - Introduction - July 28, 2026
Ramaco
Resources
Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial
Assessment Report - Section 1 - Introduction
2026-07-28
0
Issued
for Use
G.
Law
J.
Gorst
F.
Delgado
Date
Rev.
Status
Prepared
By
Checked
By
Approved
By
Approved
By
Client
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE01, Rev. 0
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 1 - Introduction - July 28, 2026
Table
of Contents
1.
Introduction
1-1
1.1
Project Context
1-1
1.2
Background and Study Objectives
1-2
1.2.1
Typical Project Development Phases
1-2
1.2.2
Concept Study
1-2
1.2.3
Initial Assessment
1-2
1.2.4
Initial Assessment Study (Revised)
1-3
1.2.5
Area / Plant Scope and Battery Limits
1-4
1.2.6
Exclusions
1-4
1.2.7
Work Breakdown Structure
1-4
List
of Figures
Figure
1-1. Typical FEL Process for Project Execution.
1-2
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE01, Rev. 0
Page 1-i
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 1 - Introduction - July 28, 2026
1. Introduction
1.1 Project
Context
Ramaco
Resources Inc. is looking to expand their Brook Mine operations to extract and recover critical minerals such as gallium, germanium,
scandium, and Rare Earth Elements (REEs) incidental to the coal operation. In addition to recovering the critical minerals, the facility
plans to generate high purity alumina (HPA) and high purity silica (HPS) as byproducts.
The
facility features a carbo-chlorination process, commercially applied within the titanium industry, for the extraction and recovery of
the critical minerals. The base-case configuration is intended to process approximately 1.3 million dry metric tonnes of ROM material
per year. A higher-capacity scenario has also been assessed for an Order of Magnitude CAPEX and OPEX only, doubling throughput to 2.6
million tonnes per annum of critical mineral feed while excluding mineralized coal from the feed stream.
This
is a greenfield project based in Ramaco Resources’ Brook Mine in northeastern Wyoming, in proximity to the mining site to facilitate
transportation logistics. The ROM is primarily made up of soft claystones and carbonaceous shales incidental to and adjacent or proximate
to coal seams, allowing for conventional surface mining with potential economic and environmental benefits compared to traditional hard
rock REE extraction. This also enables the feedstock to be used as an energy source for the carbo-chlorination reactors.
The
status of the process work is summarized as follows:
● A
test work plan was developed to confirm a preliminary flowsheet developed in 2025. This flowsheet
mainly comprised of a caustic leach followed by a two-staged acid leach for the recovery
of critical minerals and REEs. Subsequent testing of this process observed high reagent and
water consumption and rheological challenges. Alternative hydrometallurgical approaches were
also found to yield minimal critical mineral recovery.
● Ramaco
engaged a third-party laboratory to perform a carbo-chlorination feasibility trial study.
Based on the results, Ramaco started construction of their personal bench-scale laboratory
to further research carbo-chlorination.
● A
concept level study based on the carbo-chlorination technology was conducted by Hatch. This
included a conceptual flowsheet, a mass balance, and an AACE Class 5 cost estimate.
● The
process definition is to incorporate carbo-chlorination test work results once they become
available during the next phase of the project, improving the cost estimates to Class 4.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE01, Rev. 0
Page 1-1
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 1 - Introduction - July 28, 2026
1.2 Background
and Study Objectives
1.2.1 Typical
Project Development Phases
A
phased project development approach is advocated for complex metallurgical projects such as this critical mineral recovery project. The
Front-End Loading (FEL) approach, as shown in Figure 1-1, is typically applied for processing facilities and is recommended for developing
this project.
Figure
1-1: Typical FEL Process for Project Execution.
Parallel
activities would include test work, environmental and permitting approvals, and other owner’s activities.
1.2.2 Concept
Study
In
July 2025, Ramaco Resources, in collaboration with Fluor Corporation, issued a conceptual study report for the recovery the critical
minerals from the Brook Mine deposit. The facility capacity was based on 1,000 mt per annum of Critical Mineral Oxide (CMO) equivalent.
This included a conceptual flowsheet, mass balance, a Class 5 capital cost estimate (CAPEX) and an operating cost estimate (OPEX). Based
on the economics, Ramaco looked to further the project development to a Class 4 estimate.
1.2.3 Initial
Assessment
Hatch was contracted by Ramaco Resources to conduct a Pre-Feasibility
Study (PFS) and produce a Class 4 estimate based on the Fluor conceptual study. The Fluor study had defined a flowsheet that made use
of caustic leaching to extract critical minerals followed by two stages of acid leach to purify and extract REEs. The Pre-Feasibility
Study (PFS)process development commenced in September 2025, used the same flowsheet, and had an increased facility capacity of 3,000 mt
per annum of CMO equivalent.
As part of the Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS), Hatch and Ramaco
engaged SGS and ElementUSA to complete test work to validate the Fluor conceptual study flowsheet. Due to difficulties replicating conceptual
study results, testing deviated to finding alternative technologies for recovering the critical minerals. As of March 2026, collaboration
with both laboratories were suspended as Ramaco looked to pursue pyrometallurgical options and neither were equipped to perform the studies.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE01, Rev. 0
Page 1-2
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 1 - Introduction - July 28, 2026
As
the flowsheet was modified to incorporate carbo-chlorination, the Hatch PFS was paused in December 2025 and a revised Initial Assessment
study was started in its place due to insufficient flowsheet definition. The next phase of the project is scheduled to recommence following
the conclusion of the Hatch Initial Assessment Study and will incorporate Ramaco test work results. Test work conducted by Ramaco is
set to start in September 2026, once construction of the bench-scale laboratory is complete.
1.2.4 Initial
Assessment Study (Revised)
In
March 2026, Hatch started revising the process definition for the Brook Mine Rare Earth Project based on client input. Ramaco engaged
Kingston Process Metallurgy Inc. (KPM) to provide preliminary information in regards to carbo-chlorination technology for the recovery
of critical minerals.
The
new flowsheet is a novel process of existing technology with pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical operations to recover critical
minerals as gallium metal, GeO2, Sc2O3 and Mixed Rare Earth Carbonates (MREC). Carbo-chlorination is
typically utilized to selectively chlorinate and extract critical minerals from a quartz-clay feedstock. Preliminary data from KPM has
been incorporated into the design.
The
main objective of the Initial Assessment Study is to provide a preliminary process definition to assess the financial viability of the
Brook Mine REE Project. Tasks completed by Hatch to meet this objective include:
● Generating
process deliverables including the Block Flow Diagram (BFD), Process Design Basis (PDB),
Process Design Criteria (PDC), and Mass & Energy Balance (MEB). If applicable, test data
has been incorporated.
● Developing
a high level facility layout and overall footprint requirements.
● Creating
a preliminary Mechanical Equipment List (MEL) and preparing technical specifications for
major equipment supply packages to issue to vendors for budgetary proposals to support the
CAPEX.
● Developing
a capital cost estimate as per AACE Class 5 guidelines with an intended accuracy of +30%/-50%.
● Developing
an operating cost estimate.
● Preparing
a preliminary execution strategy and schedule.
● Developing
a study final report.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE01, Rev. 0
Page 1-3
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 1 - Introduction - July 28, 2026
1.2.5 Area
/ Plant Scope and Battery Limits
The
scope and battery limits for some process areas (as listed below) are defined in the following subsections to aid in communicating roles
and responsibilities.
Refer
to the PDB (H376597-0000-210-226-0002) for additional information.
1.2.5.1 Beneficiation
● All
Beneficiation equipment.
● Utilities
are assumed to be shared and distributed from the Process Plant. A local substation or e-house
may be available, and needs to be further evaluated in the next phases of the project development.
● ROM
and coal delivered via trucks by Ramaco. Battery limit at the truck discharge station.
● Instrumentation
and controls required to operate the system.
● All
foundations and structures required for the Beneficiation area.
1.2.5.2 Process
Plant
● All
equipment required for the Process Plant.
● Utility
distribution within the plant boundaries. Power battery limit at the high voltage power supplied
to the incoming terminals of the plant substation. Includes the main substation and downstream
electrical distribution. Water battery limit at the tie-in from the local well.
● Instrumentation
and controls required to operate the system.
● All
foundations and structures required for the Process Plant.
1.2.6 Exclusions
The
following are excluded from the Hatch project scope of work:
● Off-site
infrastructure such as power supply, access roads, natural gas supply, and raw water supply.
● Waste
and tailings management.
Those
are covered by Ramaco under the Owner’s Cost.
1.2.7 Work
Breakdown Structure
Refer
to the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS, H376597-0000-100-026-0001) for a comprehensive list of each area identified in the project.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE01, Rev. 0
Page 1-4
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026
Ramaco
Resources
Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial
Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition
2026-07-28
0
Issued
for Use
T.
Hodkinson
J.
Gorst
F.
Delgado
Date
Rev.
Status
Prepared
By
Checked
By
Approved
By
Approved
By
Client
H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026
Table
of Contents
2.
Process Definition
2-1
2.1
Process Design Basis
2-1
2.2
Process Overview
2-2
2.3
Process Description
2-4
2.3.1
2300 Fuel, Steam, Air and Cooling
Water Systems
2-4
2.3.2
2400 Water and Sewage Systems
2-5
2.3.3
3100 Physical Separation
2-6
2.3.4
3200 Pre-Treatment
2-7
2.3.5
4100 Carbo-Chlorination
2-9
2.3.6
4200 Critical Mineral Recovery
2-11
2.3.7
4300 Rare Earth Recovery
2-13
2.3.8
4500 Residue Management
2-16
2.3.9
4600 Chlorine Recovery
2-17
2.3.10
5100 Liquid Reagents
2-18
2.3.11
5200 Solid Reagents
2-18
2.3.12
5300 Gas Reagents
2-18
2.4
Process Model
2-19
2.5
Mass & Energy Balance
2-20
2.5.1
Key Elemental Recoveries
2-20
2.5.2
Utility Recovery
2-22
List of
Figures
Figure 2-1:
Process Overview Excluding the Reagents and Utilities.
2-3
Figure 2-2:
Two-Stage Crude Fractional Distillation System.
2-10
List of
Tables
Table 2-1:
Key Operational Parameters for the Brook Mine Critical
Mineral Project.
2-1
Table 2-2:
Causes for Product Loss in Model.
2-20
Table 2-3:
Key Elemental Recovery Overview.
2-21
Table 2-4:
Overall Water Balance for the Brook Mine Process Plant.
2-22
Table 2-5:
Overview of Process Water Usage and Recovery.
2-23
Table 2-6:
Overview of DI Water Users.
2-24
Table 2-7:
Overview of Cooling Water Users.
2-25
Table 2-8:
Overview of Steam Usage and Condensate Return.
2-26
H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0
Page 2-i
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026
2. Process
Definition
2.1 Process
Design Basis
This
section provides an overview of key parameters in the Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project Process Design Basis (PDB). The key criteria,
including the plant utilization, throughput, feed material composition, and production rates are summarized in Table 2-1 below. Where
ROM is the Run of Mine, TREE is the Total Rare Earth Elements, CMO is the Critical Mineral Oxides (Total Rare Earth Oxides (TREO), Sc2O3,
Ga2O3 , and GeO2), HPA is High Purity Alumina, and HPS is High Purity Silica.
Table
2-1: Key Operational Parameters for the Brook Mine Critical Mineral Project.
Parameter
Units
Values
Plant
Availability
%
92
Annual
Operating Hours
h
/ y
8,059
ROM
Annual Throughput Flowrate1
dry
million mt / y
1.3
ROM
Critical Mineral Concentration
ppm
404.46
TREE
Concentration
ppm
344
Sc
Concentration
ppm
20.9
Ga
Concentration
ppm
37.2
Ge
Concentration
ppm
2.4
Coal
Critical Mineral Concentration
ppm
334.01
TREE
Concentration
ppm
307.01
Sc
Concentration
ppm
18
Ga
Concentration
ppm
8
Ge
Concentration
ppm
1
Target
CMO Equivalent Production2
dry
mt / y
574
Original
Target HPA Production
mt
/ y
1,800
Updated
Target HPA Production – July 20263
mt
/ y
11,848
Target
HPS Production
mt
/ y
18,617
1 This
flowrate does not account for coal throughput, which is varied based on carbo-chlorination
demand.
2 This
production rate is based on the equivalent oxide production of Ga metal, GeO2,
Sc2O3, and mixed rare earth carbonate (MREC).
3 An
updated HPA production rate was provided by Ramaco (email: “RE: HPA Production”,
received July 8th, 2026). While the original production rate is used for the process
definition and site plan, the updated HPA production rate is the basis for the CAPEX and
OPEX.
H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0
Page 2-1
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026
General parameters were either based
on the previously completed report by Fluor, provided by Ramaco through email or RFI correspondences. Feed critical mineral concentrations
for the ROM and coal were based on third-party test work and confirmed by Ramaco (refer to RFI 0006, H376597-0000-210-465-0006).
The
target CMO production rate is based on CMO-equivalent flowrates and an assumed 90% overall recovery of CMOs. This value excludes any
critical minerals introduced by the coal. The actual CMO recoveries can be found in the Section 2.5.
For
more information refer to the PDB (H376597-0000-210-226-0002).
2.2 Process
Overview
This
section provides a process plant overview based on Work Breakdown Structure (WBS – H376597-0000-100-026-0001). Area 4400, Tailings
Filtration and Storage, was excluded from Hatch’s scope of work.
H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0
Page 2-2
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026
Figure
2-1: Process Overview Excluding the Reagents and Utilities.
H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0
Page 2-3
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026
Process
operations within each WBS block is summarized as follows:
● Physical
Separation: feed preparation by reducing particle size distribution, with some quartz removal
from the ROM.
● Pre-Treatment:
ROM drying and calcination, coal coking, and applicable off-gas treatment.
● Carbo-Chlorination:
chlorination of the ROM and coke leading to the volatilization of select species. The gas
stream is passed through a series of de-sublimators and fractional distillation to systematically
remove select species.
● Critical
Mineral Recovery: individually recovered Ga, Ge, Al, and Si streams are refined to produce
Ga metal, GeO2, HPA, and HPS.
● Chlorine
Recovery: any chloride-rich waste or purge streams are combined to produce Cl2
gas which is recycled to the Carbo-Chlorination area.
● Rare
Earth Recovery: non-volatilized chloride solids from Carbo-Chlorination are leached in water
and treated to produce Sc2O3 and MREC.
● Residue
Management: any hydrometallurgical waste streams (including crud) from the process are combined,
neutralized, crystallized, and dried prior to disposal.
For
more information, refer to Section 2.3.
2.3 Process
Description
This
section provides an overview of the process areas within the plant. The process descriptions are presented in accordance with Figure
2-1 and the WBS (H376597-0000-100-026-0001).
For
additional information, refer to the PDB (H376597-0000-210-226-0002), Process Design Criteria (PDC, H376597-0000-210-210-0001), Block
Flow Diagram (BFD, H376597-0000-210-252-0005), and Stream Table (H376597-0000-210-216-0002).
2.3.1 2300
Fuel, Steam, Air and Cooling Water Systems
2.3.1.1 2310
Plant Air System
This
system excludes any air requirement for the Air Separation Plant. Refer to Section 2.3.12 for additional information.
Plant
air is sourced from compressed air on-site. Compressed air is generated using air compressors. The compressed air is temporarily stored
in the air receivers before distribution. The pressure is then dropped to the desired value depending on the user requirement. Plant
air is distributed throughout the site for dust collection, pneumatic conveying, plate filter requirements, polishing filter requirements,
and reagent offloading.
H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0
Page 2-4
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026
2.3.1.2 2320
Instrument Air System
Plant
air is used to supply instrument control. A portion of low pressure air is dried using air dryers. The instrument air is distributed
to various users within the plant.
2.3.1.3 2330
Steam Generation and Distribution
This
area distributes live steam to end users. Saturated steam is generated in a natural gas fired boiler package supplemented by a glycol
heat recovery system from the Residue Oxidation area. The steam is distributed at 152°C and 5 bar(a) to supply the Mechanical Vapour
Recompression (MVR) systems, distillation columns and ROM dryers. Returned steam condensate and DI water (as make-up source) are used
to produce fresh steam.
2.3.1.4 2340
Cooling Water Systems
This
area produces and distributes cooling water to remove excess heat from heat exchangers, de-sublimators, and distillation columns. An
evaporative cooling tower is used to produce 25°C water that is distributed throughout the plant and returned at 50°C. Process
water is used as make-up source to the cooling tower, supplementing tower losses from evaporation, drift or blowdown.
2.3.2 2400
Water and Sewage Systems
2.3.2.1 2410
Deionized Water Production and Distribution System
This
area produces and distributes deionized (DI) water for impurity-sensitive areas. It is used as diluent, cake wash water, and hydrolysis
water source for the production of GeO2, MREC, and Sc2O3. DI water is supplemented by treated process
water and is distributed throughout the plant at 25°C. Details regarding the DI water production package are to be defined by vendors.
2.3.2.2 2420
Process Water and Condensate Distribution System
This
area produces and distributes process water throughout the plant. Process water is distributed at 50°C to supply de-sublimators,
filters, centrifuges, leach tanks, gas scrubbers, and mineral process water system. Process water from the de-sublimators and recovered
from MVR systems are cooled to 50°C and re-distributed as process water. Process water is supplemented by treated raw well water.
Details regarding the raw water treatment package are to be defined by vendors.
2.3.2.3 2430
Potable Water Production and Distribution System
Potable
water is supplemented by the process water. It is currently assumed that treated raw water (i.e., fresh process water) is sufficient
to meet potable water requirements. Potable water is distributed at ambient temperature for ablutions, drinking fountains, eyewash and
safety showers.
2.3.2.4 2440
Fire Water System
Treated
process water is used as source of fire water. An off-take from the treated raw water stream is used as make-up water for the fire water
system.
H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0
Page 2-5
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026
2.3.3 3100
Physical Separation
2.3.3.1 3110
ROM Feeding
ROM
and REE-enriched coal are transported via trucks from the mines to their respective comminution circuits. Both feed streams contain levels
of critical minerals (Ge, Ga, Sc), REEs, kaolinite (Al2O3∙2SiO2∙2H2O), and impurities.
See the PDB (H376597-0000-210-226-0002) for additional information.
2.3.3.2 3120
Comminution
The
ROM feed is sent through a series of two crushers, first decreasing the P80 to 40 mm via a tooth rolled crusher and then to 10 mm via
a roller crusher. The crushed ROM is sent to a 2-day storage stockpile and conveyed to downstream operation using a subterranean apron
feeder.
The
coal feed is sent through a primary roller crusher to decrease the P80 to the target size (TBD, pending carbo-chlorination test work).
As the target coal size is currently unknown, a single roller crusher is assumed to be sufficient. The crushed coal is sent to a 2-day
storage stockpile and conveyed to the Coking area using a subterranean apron feeder.
2.3.3.3 3130
Wet Scrubbing
Wet
Scrubbing is used to further decrease particle size and separate the quartz-clay agglomerates, promoting quartz removal downstream.
The
stockpiled ROM is passed through attrition cells to eliminate agglomeration that may have formed during stockpiling. Mineral process
water is added to slurry the ROM to 65 wt.% solids. The slurry is pumped to a log washer to increase residence time for agglomeration
breakdown. Additional mineral process water is added to achieve a 10 wt.% solids slurry. The slurry is then pumped to the Flotation area.
2.3.3.4 3140
Flotation (Quartz Removal)
The
slurry from Wet Scrubbing is pumped to a de-sliming cyclone to separate fine particles from coarser ones. Fine particles are sent directly
to the Thickening & Dewatering area while coarser particles are sent to a flotation conditioning tank. Mineral process water is added
to the slurry to dilute it to 15 wt.% solids. The slurry is pumped to the flotation bank where the flotation collector and frother are
added to promote collection of clay and mica, rejecting quartz in the process.
Flotation
bank overflow is sent to the Thickening & Dewatering area while the underflow is sent to a centrifuge to dewater the quartz solids
for disposal. The centrate is sent to the Thickening & Dewatering area to recapture any fine particles entrained.
H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0
Page 2-6
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026
2.3.3.5 3150
Thickening & Dewatering
The
Thickening & Dewatering area recovers as much mineral process water as possible. This step is essential to minimizing fresh process
water demand to the Wet Scrubbing area and to decreasing energy consumption in the Pre-Treatment area (i.e., ROM drying and roasting).
The
flotation overflow slurry, along with the flotation centrifuge centrate and de-sliming overflow, is sent to a thickener. The thickener
underflow is pumped to a centrifuge to decrease the solid moisture content to 35 wt.% and the cake is conveyed to the ROM Drying area.
The thickener overflow and centrifuge centrate are sent to the Mineral Process Water System to recycle the water.
2.3.3.6 3160
Mineral Process Water System
Water
from the Thickening & Dewatering system is recovered in the Mineral Process Water System. A 2.5 wt.% purge line is included on the
recovered water line to prevent build-up of impurities. Fresh process water is used as make-up source for the mineral process water in
this area. Mineral process water is solely used within the Physical Separation area (WBS 3100).
2.3.4 3200
Pre-Treatment
2.3.4.1 3210
Drying (Kaolinite)
Conveyed
solids from the Thickening & Dewatering area are sent to a kaolinite dryer to decrease cake moisture content from 35 wt.% to 8 wt.%.
The dryer is indirectly heated by steam. The dried cake is sent to the ROM Calcining area. The evaporated water is condensed and recovered
as process water.
2.3.4.2 3220
Calcining (Kaolinite)
Dried
ROM from the Drying area is passed through a roaster to convert 95% of the kaolinite into meta-kaolinite, generating water in the process.
Any water present is evaporated.
1
This
conversion improves aluminum and silicon chlorination in the Carbo-Chlorination area and prevents potential operational difficulties
from having water present in the system. Pyrite is expected to be oxidized in this roaster, producing SOx by-products (represented as
SO2 and to be confirmed by test work) that require neutralization in the Roaster Off-Gas System area.
2
2.3.4.3 3230
Roaster Off-Gas System
The
ROM roaster off-gas is sent to the Roaster Off-Gas System. This system is composed of two parts: solids recapture, and off-gas treatment.
Solids entrained in the off-gas from the roaster are mainly recovered by a cyclone. The remaining off-gas is then sent through a spray
cooler followed by a trim cooler to reduce the stream temperature to 220°C, as per baghouse temperature limitations. Once cooled
to 220°C, the stream is passed through dust baghouses to recover all residual solids. All recovered solids are sent to the Carbo-Chlorination
area.
H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0
Page 2-7
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026
The
off-gas discharge from the baghouse is sent to a neutralization packed bed scrubber. Dilute sodium hydroxide (2 wt.%) is passed through
the scrubber to solubilize and neutralize the SOx species present in the off-gas.
3
The
neutralized solution is then pumped to the ZLD Neutralization, Evaporation & Drying area. The scrubber vent is sent to a stack for
ventilation to the atmosphere.
2.3.4.4 3240
Coking (Coal)
Coal
from a stockpile is conveyed to a nitrogen-blanketed furnace for coking. As the Carbo-Chlorination area is highly sensitive to the presence
of water, coal is transformed into coke within the furnace unit. The coal is mined locally within Brook Mine and contains critical minerals
and kaolinite. Within the furnace unit, kaolinite is converted into meta-kaolinite (refer to Reaction 1) and all water present is evaporated.
Similarly to the Calcining area, pyrite is expected to partially degrade, generating some amounts of sulphur gas due to the oxygen-free
environment that will require neutralization.
4
The
furnace off-gas is sent to the Coking Off-Gas System area to recover the coke and neutralize undesired species.
2.3.4.5 3250
Coking Off-Gas System
The
Coking Off-Gas System is identical to the Roaster Off-Gas System, where the solids are first recaptured and then the off-gas treated
via neutralization scrubber. The air addition in the trim cooler oxidizes the sulphur generated from Reaction 4, producing other SOx
species that are neutralized in the scrubbing unit as per Reaction 3.
5
Recovered
solids are sent to the Carbo-Chlorination area. Refer to Section 2.3.4.3 for additional information.
Residual
organic species found in the off-gas and generated during the coking process are to be used as syngas by the client. This is outside
the scope of this study.
H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0
Page 2-8
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026
2.3.5 4100
Carbo-Chlorination
2.3.5.1 4110
Carbo-Chlorination
Roasted
ROM is conveyed from the Calcining area to the carbo-chlorination fluidized bed reactors, which operate at 1,050°C. Chlorine gas,
from the Chlorine Recover area, is injected into the reactors as chlorine source and fluidizing agent. Coke from the Coking area is added
to facilitate reduction of oxide species and react with free oxygen to form carbon monoxide, driving the chlorination reactions (outlined
below) forward. Impurities are listed in Reactions 6 to 15, where “M” indicates an impurity element.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Carbo-chlorination
off-gas is sent to cyclones to recapture fine solids and recombine with the solid discharge. The carbo-chlorination solids are cooled
via a paddle cooler to 100°C and then conveyed to the Water Leach area. The remaining off-gas stream is sent to the De-Sublimation
1 area for the recovery of desired species.
2.3.5.2 4120
De-Sublimation 1 (Alkali Salt Removal)
The
Alkali Salt Removal de-sublimator cools the carbo-chlorination off-gas to 400°C, selectively de-sublimating REEs and other species
that may have unintentionally been vaporized or sublimated. The off-gas from the de-sublimator is sent to a cyclone to recapture fine
solids. The solids are sent to the Water Leaching area while the gas stream is sent to a secondary de-sublimation unit, De-Sublimation
2.
2.3.5.3 4130
De-Sublimation 2 (Ferric Removal)
The
Ferric Removal de-sublimator cools the gas stream from the first de-sublimator to 280°C to de-sublimate FeCl3. The off-gas
is sent to a cyclone followed by a ceramic filter to recapture all the de-sublimated solids. It is then sent to De-Sublimation 3. The
solids are sent to the Residue Oxidation area to recover the chlorine as Cl2 gas.
H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0
Page 2-9
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026
2.3.5.4 4140
De-Sublimation 3 (Al / Ga Recovery)
The
Al / Ga Recovery de-sublimation system is made up of a pre-cooler and a de-sublimating venturi scrubber. The pre-cooler lowers the gas
temperature to 150°C via indirect cooling with cooling water. The cooled gas is then sent to a venturi scrubber where a Ga-rich n-dodecane
solution is used to further cool the gas to 140°C. This temperature drop de-sublimates AlCl3 and condenses GaCl3.
The GaCl3 is then subsequently displaced into n-dodecane due to its high organic solubility.
A
centrifuge is used to separate the Ga-rich n-dodecane from the AlCl3 solids. The solids are sent to the Alumina Separation
& Recovery area while the Ga-rich n-dodecane is primarily recycled to the venturi scrubber to further concentrate the solution. A
small bleed of the concentrated solution is sent to the Gallium Separation & Recovery area for gallium metal production.
2.3.5.5 4150
Off-Gas Separation
The
off-gas from the De-Sublimation 3 area is sent to a pre-condenser unit. This unit lowers the temperature to 50°C, the chloride species
are condensed and the incondensable species are sent to off-gas treatment. This step decreases the volumetric flow downstream. Following
the pre-condenser, the liquor is sent to a two-stage crude fractional distillation system to recover Ge- and Si-rich solutions. Figure
2-2 below outlines the fractional distillation system and the destination of each discharge stream.
Figure
2-2: Two-Stage Crude Fractional Distillation System.
The
residual off-gas stream from the pre-condenser is passed through a packed bed scrubber to neutralize any residual SOx and Cl2
that may be present. Dilute sodium hydroxide (2 wt.%) is passed through the scrubber and the neutralized discharge is sent to the
ZLD Neutralization, Evaporation & Drying area. The remaining gas is sent through a thermal oxidizer to convert CO into CO2
and then through to a stack for ventilation to atmosphere.
H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0
Page 2-10
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026
2.3.6 4200
Critical Mineral Recovery
2.3.6.1 4210
Gallium Separation & Recovery
The
Ga-rich n-dodecane bleed from the De-Sublimation 3 area is sent to a Ga stripping mixer-settler. The organic solution is contacted with
DI water to hydrolyze and re-solubilize Ga in the aqueous solution. The organic discharge is returned to the De-Sublimation 3 centrifuge
to be used as fresh n-dodecane. The aqueous discharge is first passed through a pair of multimedia filters to recover any entrained organic
and then sent to the Ga precipitation tank. The recovered organic is sent to the n-Dodecane Crud Treatment area to ensure proper phase
separation prior to recycling the n-dodecane.
Aqueous
Ga is precipitated as Ga(OH)3 via pH adjustment to pH 7 with a sodium hydroxide solution.
16
The
slurry is passed through a thickener and filter press to reduce the moisture content to 25 wt.%. The cake is then re-dissolved in
DI water and sodium hydroxide for electrowinning. For the re-dissolution step, sodium hydroxide pellets are used to minimize reagent
impurity entrainment. The dissolved solution is fed to electrowinning cells to produce Ga metal. The metal (in liquid form) drains from
the electrode and pools at the bottom of the cell. This is then decanted off and packaged in plastic bottles. The residual electrowinning
solution is partially recycled to the re-dissolution tank while the remainder is sent to the ZLD Neutralization, Evaporation & Drying
area.
2.3.6.2 4220
Alumina Separation & Recovery
Solids
from the De-Sublimation 3 centrifuge are sent through a n-dodecane displacement step. As n-dodecane and AlCl3 have similar
boiling/sublimation points, it is difficult to properly separate them from one another. As such, a centrifuge is used to displace the
n-dodecane with hexane, an organic with a much lower boiling point (~69°C). This allows for recovery of AlCl3 as the wet
cake is sent through a drying unit to evaporate the hexane. Hexane can then be condensed and recycled. Displaced n-dodecane is recovered
and recycled back to the De-Sublimation 3 area.
Dried
aluminum solids are split into two streams based on target annual HPA production: one for HPA production and the other sent to Chlorine
Recovery area for Cl2 gas generation. The HPA production line sends the solids to a pyrolysis reactor operating at 1,150°C
where pure oxygen is injected to produce alumina.
17
Off-gas
from the reactor is passed through a cyclone to recover any solids entrained and then sent to the Chlorine Recovery area to recover chlorine
from any unreacted AlCl3.
H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0
Page 2-11
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026
The
Al2O3 solids are sent to a furnace, where they are held at 1,100°C for 3 hours to ensure conversion of all
Al2O3 solids to the alpha form. The product is then cooled to 70°C for packaging into bulk bags.
2.3.6.3 4230
Germanium Separation & Recovery
The
Ge-rich solution from the Off-Gas Separation crude fractional distillation system is sent to a HCl-azeotropic still operating at 108°C
to remove impurities (i.e., Si, Ti, and P). DI water is added to the still to hydrolyze the impurities.
18
19
20
21
While
Ge also hydrolyzes in the presence of water, the acid generated from the other reactions re-solubilize the Ge as it is soluble in hydrochloric
acid solutions greater than 7.8 M. Within the still, water, hydrochloric acid and GeCl4 are expected to evaporate at 108°C.
The vapour is condensed and sent to a decanter operating at 40°C to selectively extract the GeCl4 as it is a much denser
liquor than water and hydrochloric acid.
The
water and hydrochloric acid solution is partially recycled to the azeotropic still and the residual is sent to the ZLD Waste Neutralization,
Evaporation & Drying area. The azeotropic still bottom discharge, primarily containing SiO2, TiO2 and H3PO3,
is sent to the ZLD Waste Neutralization, Evaporation & Drying area.
DI
water is added to the concentrated GeCl4 solution to hydrolyze the Ge, allowing it to precipitate and be recovered following
a solid-liquid separation.
22
The
product is dried at 110°C to a moisture content of 5%. It is then cooled to 50°C and packaged into drums.
2.3.6.4 4240
Silica Separation & Recovery
The
Si-rich solution from the crude fractional distillation system (see Figure 2-2) is split into two streams based on annual target HPS
production: one for HPS production and the other sent to Chlorine Recovery area for Cl2 gas generation. The silica production
line sends the liquid SiCl4 to a flame pyrolysis reactor operating at 1,200°C where pure oxygen is injected to produce
silica.
23
Off-gas
from the reactor is passed through a cyclone and ceramic filter to recover any solids entrained and then sent to the Chlorine Recovery
area to recover chlorine from any unreacted SiCl4. The solids are sent to a cooler prior to packaging and storage of the silica
product in bulk bags.
H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0
Page 2-12
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026
2.3.7 4300
Rare Earth Recovery
2.3.7.1 4310
Water Leaching
Unreacted
solids and non-volatilized chloride species from the Carbo-Chlorination area are sent to the Water Leaching area where water is used
to repulp and dissolve the chloride solids. This includes the dissolution of REEs and some impurities. The slurry is pumped to filter
presses to separate the residual solids from the liquor. The solids are sent to the Waste ZLD Neutralization, Evaporation & Drying
area for disposal. The liquor is sent to an evaporation unit to remove excess water from the solution. A MVR is included as part of the
evaporation system to decrease steam consumption.
The
concentrated solution is sent to the Al-Sc Hydroxide Recovery area for separation of Al and Sc from the liquor. The evaporator condensate
is recycled in the plant as process water.
2.3.7.2 4320
Al-Sc Hydroxide Recovery
The
concentrated liquor from Water Leaching evaporator is pumped to a ferric reduction tank, where elemental iron is added to reduce any
ferric present to ferrous form.
24
Ferrous
ions have greater solubility in less acidic (i.e., more neutral) pH conditions. This is necessary to prevent the co-precipitation of
Fe with products in downstream units.
The
solution is pumped through candle filters to remove any Fe that remained undissolved. The filtrate is sent to a pH adjustment tank for
the precipitation of Al and Sc. Sodium hydroxide is added to achieve a target pH of 4 and selectively precipitate Al(OH)3
and Sc(OH)3.
25
26
The
resulting slurry is then pumped through filter presses. The Sc-rich cake is sent to the Scandium Separation area while the filtrate is
sent to the Rare Earth Separation area.
2.3.7.3 4330
Scandium Separation
The
solids precipitated in Al-Sc Hydroxide Recovery are re-dissolved in hydrochloric acid at a pH of 0.2. The tank is maintained at 35°C
to minimize organic volatilization in the solvent-extraction (SX) units downstream.
27
28
H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0
Page 2-13
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026
The
solution is sent through a candle filter to ensure that minimal solids are present prior to SX. Presence of solids in mixer-settlers
increase the rate of crud formation.
After
filtration, the solution is passed through a Sc SX circuit which includes extraction, washing and stripping stages. Exact number of mixer-settlers
per section is still pending and to be determined based on test work. The organic extractant used for this circuit is PC-88A (aka P507,
Ionquest 801). It is diluted in kerosene and TBP is used as a modifier to aid in the organic phase stability. For the extraction stages,
the O:A ratio is 6:1 and the following extraction extents are expected based on literature, where R represents PC-88A.
99%
29
4%
30
The
raffinate from the extraction stage is sent through a pair of multimedia filters to remove any entrained organics and is then pumped
to the ZLD Neutralization, Evaporation & Drying area for disposal. Recovered organic from the multimedia filters is sent to Sc Extractant
Crud Treatment area.
Following
extraction, the loaded organic phase is sent to the washing stage to remove entrained impurities (i.e., Al), improving the overall Sc
recovery. A 1 M hydrochloric acid solution is used to wash and scrub the organic solution. The O:A ratio for this stage is based on stoichiometric
requirement.
31
Used
washing solution is sent to the extraction mixer-settlers to recover any Sc that may have accidentally been scrubbed out of the organic
phase.
The
washed, loaded organic solution is sent to the stripping stage. A 2 M sodium hydroxide solution is used to strip scandium from the organic
phase, ensuring a solution pH above 14 so that scandium remains soluble. Within the same stage, partial saponification of the organic
phase is performed. Saponification of PC-88A is required to control the operating pH in the extraction stage and improve extraction extent.
Only 30% saponification was specified to prevent the formation of a third phase in the mixer-settlers. The O:A ratio for this stage is
based on stoichiometric requirement.
32
30%
33
The
stripped organic solution is returned to the extraction stage and the loaded strip liquor (LSL) is passed through multimedia filters
to remove any entrained organic prior to being pumped to the Scandium Oxide Production area. Recovered organic from the multimedia filters
is sent to the Sc Extractant Crud Treatment.
H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0
Page 2-14
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026
2.3.7.4 4340
Scandium Oxide Production
The
Sc-rich solution from the Scandium Separation is sent to a precipitation tank, where hydrochloric acid is added to neutralize the pH
to 8.5. This results in the precipitation of scandium as a hydroxide.
34
The
slurry is then pumped through a thickener and filter press to recover the solids as a wet cake. The scandium cake is calcined at 800°C
to produce scandium oxide solids, evaporating any water present in the process.
35
The
calciner discharge is then cooled, packaged in drums and sent to storage. The residual filtrate is sent to the ZLD Waste Neutralization,
Evaporation & Drying area for disposal.
2.3.7.5 4350
Rare Earth Separation
The
filtrate from the Al-Sc Hydroxide Recovery area is sent to a precipitation tank where sodium hydroxide is added to neutralize the solution
pH to 6.5. This is expected to precipitate the REEs as hydroxides.
36
The
resulting slurry is pumped through a thickener followed by filter presses and the solids are sent to the MREC Production area while the
filtrate is sent to ZLD Neutralization, Evaporation & Drying for disposal.
2.3.7.6 4360
MREC Production
The
REE hydroxide solids from Rare Earth Separation are re-leached with hydrochloric acid and passed through a candle filter to separate
the liquor from un-dissolved solids.
37
The
liquor is then pumped to a series of carbonate precipitation tanks, where a sodium carbonate solution (15% Na2CO3)
is added and the REEs are precipitated as hydrated carbonates.
38
Filter
presses are used to isolate the solids, which are washed with DI water prior to being conveyed to a drying unit to decrease the moisture
content to ≤5%. The dried solids are cooled, packaged and sent to storage.
H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0
Page 2-15
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026
2.3.8 4500
Residue Management
2.3.8.1 4510
ZLD Neutralization Evaporation & Drying
Waste
streams from various hydrometallurgical process areas are combined in a neutralization tank. Acidic or basic solids are repulped in the
tank using either process water or water from liquid waste streams. Hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide solutions are added to neutralize
the mixture to a pH of 7.
The
slurry is then passed through filter presses to separate the solids from the liquor. While the solids are directly sent to the drying
unit, the liquor is sent to an evaporative crystallization system to concentrate and precipitate impurities. The evaporative crystallization
system operates at 103°C and contains an evaporator, crystallizer, centrifuge and MVR circuit. The centrifuge centrate is recirculated
to the crystallizer feed to concentrate the solution and maximize precipitation of impurities. The centrifuge cake is sent to a drying
unit.
Cakes
from the neutralization solid-liquid separation and the centrifuge are conveyed and combined at the feed of a rotary dryer. The dryer
operates at 110°C and dries the combined cake to 5% moisture. The dried cake is then conveyed to an on-site stockpile for storage.
2.3.8.2 4520
n-Dodecane Crud Treatment
The
ventilation gas from the Gallium Separation & Recovery mixer-settler is passed through a condenser where the aqueous and organic
vapors are condensed at low temperatures. The vent gas stream is then passed through a mist eliminator to remove residual organic or
aqueous mist and then through an activated carbon column prior to being released to atmosphere. The condensed and coalesced liquids from
the condenser and mist eliminator are drained by gravity to a condensate tank.
Any
organic crud that accumulates in the Ga stripping mixer-settler is manually removed using a portable crud pump. This crud is sent to
a crud tank to be combined with the backwash liquor stream from the organic recovery multimedia filters. The mixed crud solution is pumped
to a three phase centrifuge where the phases (aqueous, organic, and solid) are separated. The organic phase is sent to the recovered
organic tank and is pumped to the De-Sublimation 3 area. The recovered aqueous phase is sent to the gallium precipitation section to
recover any residual gallium present. The solid crud is stored in crud drums for disposal.
H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0
Page 2-16
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026
2.3.8.3 4530
Sc Extractant Crud Treatment
Ventilation
gases from the Scandium Separation SX mixer-settlers are combined and passed through a condenser where the aqueous and organic vapors
are condensed at low temperatures. The vent gas stream is then passed through a mist eliminator to remove residual organic or aqueous
mist and then through an activated carbon column prior to being released to atmosphere. The condensed and coalesced liquids from the
condenser and mist eliminator are drained by gravity to a condensate tank.
Any
organic crud that accumulates in the SX mixer-settlers are manually removed using a portable crud pump. This crud is sent to a crud tank
to be combined with the backwash liquor stream from the scandium organic recovery multimedia filters. The mixed crud solution is pumped
to a three phase centrifuge where the phases (aqueous, organic, and solid) are separated. The organic phase is sent to the recovered
organic tank and is pumped to the Scandium Separation organic feed tank. The recovered aqueous phase is sent to the Scandium Separation
SX feed tank to recover any residual scandium present. The solid crud is stored in crud drums for disposal.
2.3.9 4600
Chlorine Recovery
2.3.9.1 4610
Residue Oxidation
Anhydrous
chloride mixtures and off-gas streams from Areas 4100 and 4200 are sent through two stages of oxidation at different operating temperatures
to recover Cl2. The first stage operates at 600°C and oxygen is added to promote the oxidation of iron.
39
Natural
gas is used to maintain the operating temperature in the unit due to the heating demand for the vaporization of incoming chloride species.
The gas discharge is sent to the second oxidation stage while the solids generated are separated and disposed.
The
second oxidation stage operates at 1000°C and has excess pure oxygen added to allow for the oxidation of the remaining chloride species.
40
41
42
43
44
The
above oxidation reactions generate significant excess energy. As such, heat integration via a glycol intermediate has been included,
though it would need to be confirmed by vendors. It is proposed that the glycol would be used as cooling medium for the second oxidation
stage. The heated glycol is then used as heating medium for steam generation – decreasing the cooling water demand for the oxidation
stage and energy demand for fresh steam production.
H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0
Page 2-17
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026
The
gas discharge is sent to the Chlorine Quench & Off-Gas Treatment area and the solids generated are separated and disposed.
2.3.9.2 4620
Chlorine Quench & Off-Gas Treatment
The
gas from the Residue Oxidation area is sent through a quenching unit to drop the stream temperature to 50°C. This condenses any water
and hydrochloric acid that may have been produced as a result of organic degradation and other impurity reactions. Other condensable
species are also removed at this stage. The condensed solution is sent to the ZLD Neutralization, Evaporation & Drying area for disposal.
The
cooled chlorine gas is compressed and returned to the Carbo-Chlorination area to be used as a chlorinating agent.
2.3.10 5100
Liquid Reagents
Liquid
reagents are delivered to the facility either in metal drums or tanker trucks. Upon arrival, the reagents are unloaded using pumps for
transfer to their respective storage tanks. The storage tanks are specifically designed to safely hold their respective reagents until
needed for various applications within the facility.
2.3.11 5200
Solid Reagents
Iron
powder is delivered to the facility in bulk bags. The bags are lifted to a bag breaker and discharged into a storage hopper for use in
the Al-Sc Hydroxide Recovery area.
Soda
ash is delivered to the facility in bulk bags. The bags are lifted to a bag breaker and discharged into a tank where the solids are mixed
with DI water to produce a 15% soda ash solution. The soda ash solution is passed through a candle filter to remove any undissolved solids.
Solids are collected in a skip and sent to the ZLD Neutralization, Evaporation & Drying area for disposal. The filtered soda ash
solution is stored in a tank for distribution within the plant.
Sodium
hydroxide pellets are delivered to the facility in sealed drums. The drums are stored in proximity to the Gallium Separation & Recovery
area and periodically emptied into a storage hopper for distribution. As sodium hydroxide pellets are highly hygroscopic, residence time
in the storage hopper is kept to a minimum to minimize handling concerns.
Flotation
collector is delivered to the facility in bulk bags. The bags are lifted to a bag breaker and discharged into a storage hopper for use
in the Wet Scrubbing area.
2.3.12 5300
Gas Reagents
Chlorine
gas is delivered to site in liquified form. It is unloaded using pumps for transfer to pressurized vessels for distribution to the Carbo-Chlorination
area.
H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0
Page 2-18
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026
An
air separation plant is located on site, in proximity to the processing areas. The separation plant is responsible for producing pure
oxygen and pure nitrogen for use within the plant. The argon residue is to be packaged and sold as a by-product. The capacity of the
air separation plant is based on the oxygen requirement for the process plant. Details regarding the air separation plant are to be provided
by the vendor.
2.4 Process
Model
The
Mass & Energy Balance (MEB) for this study was developed in Kenwalt SysCAD, a plant simulation software, based on steady-state operation.
Brook Mine’s elevation was used to determine the ambient pressure of the model (i.e., 1,210 m elevation leading to 87.6 kPa(a)).
The
mineralogy of the ROM and coal feeds were determined based on test work either conducted by Ramaco or by a third-party laboratory. The
carbon composition of the ROM was assumed to be variable and could be modified based on heating requirements in the ROM roaster unit.
Refer to Section 2.1 or the PDC (H376597-0000-210-210-0001) for additional detail on feed composition.
Reagent
composition and purity level were based on typical supplier specifications. Raw water treatments for plant utilization (i.e., Raw Water
Treatment and DI Water Production Package) were not modeled due to the insufficient information on the well water quality. Other utilities
used were modeled based on the specifications in the PDB (H376597-0000-210-226-0002) and PDC (H376597-0000-210-210-0001).
Physical
and thermodynamic properties for each chemical species within the plant were defined based on available data from HSC (v.6 and v.10),
OLI Studio (v.12.5), NIST chemistry database, and literature. If a species was found to be missing critical information, it was assumed
that it shared properties with a similar species.
Equipment
heat losses, especially in pyrometallurgical units, were not modeled due to insufficient process definition. Any pH parameters were confirmed
using the MSE-SRK database within OLI Studio.
As
limited test work was available for the unit operations within the plant, reaction extents were either based on literature, client data,
or assumptions. Based on client input, overall recovery of gallium and germanium were set to be 94% and 84%, respectively (H376597-0000-210-034-0004).
These recovery extents were achieved by varying the chlorination extents of Ga and Ge in the carbo-chlorination unit. Optimal recovery
was assumed for all subsequent stages. An overview of major product losses is summarized in Table 2-2 below.
H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0
Page 2-19
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026
Table
2-2: Causes for Product Loss in Model.
Location
Affected
Element
Description
Ga
Ge
REE
Sc
Carbo-Chlorination
X
X
X
X
Expected
chlorination of species limit the overall recovery of products.
Crude
Fractional Distillation
X
External
modeling indicated Ge losses due to its low concentration.
Filters
X
X
X
Liquid
elements passed through filters had some losses to the cake moisture.
Additional
information regarding the MEB results are discussed in Section 2.5 below.
2.5 Mass
& Energy Balance
This
section provides a high level summary on the critical mineral deportments and utility recovery. For more information refer to the Stream
Table (H376597-0000-210-216-0002) and the PDC (H376597-0000-210-210-0001).
Values
presented in this section are based on the original HPA production rate of 1,800 metric tonnes per annum (refer to Section 2.1).
2.5.1 Key
Elemental Recoveries
Expanding
on the information summarized in Table 2-2, the overall recovery of the critical minerals as well as Al and Si are summarized below in
Table 2-3.The recovery of Al and Si is intentionally low, since the target HPA and HPS production rates were less than the total amount
of Al and Si chlorinated (see Section 2.1). Therefore portions of the AlCl3 and SiCl4 were sent to the Chlorine
Recovery area to recover Cl2 for the carbo-chlorination unit.
H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0
Page 2-20
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026
Table
2-3: Key Elemental Recovery Overview.
Al
Ga
Ge
Si
Sc
REE
Source
(kg
/ h)
ROM
Feed
14,700
6.06
0.39
47,600
3.40
56.1
REE-Enriched
Coal
119
0.20
0.03
805
0.46
7.82
Destination
HPA
0.8%
-
-
-
-
-
Ga
Metal
-
94%
-
-
-
-
High
Purity GeO2
-
-
84%
-
-
-
HPS
-
-
0.7
%
2%
-
-
Sc2O3
-
-
-
-
79%
-
MREC
-
-
-
-
-
80%
Rejected
Quartz
-
-
-
53%
-
-
Chlorination
Oxide Solids
74.5%
-
7.5
%
22%
-
-
ZLD
Waste
24.7%
6%
7.7
%
22%
21%
20%
In
the carbo-chlorination unit, the reaction extents for Sc and the REEs were assumed to be 80% as insufficient information on the reaction
kinetics was available. For more information, refer to the PDC (H376597-0000-210-210-0001). Unreacted Sc and REE were assumed to not
leach in water and would be sent to Residue Management. Additional Sc losses were due to the Sc SX extraction extent and filtration steps,
bringing the overall recover of Sc to 79%. It was assumed that there were no additional REE losses.
The
reaction extents for Ga and Ge were varied in the carbo-chlorination unit to achieve the target overall recovery of 94% and 84%, respectively
(refer to H376597-0000-210-034-0004). Carbo-chlorination was the main determining factor for Ga recovery, with minor other losses. For
Ge, however, additional losses were tied to the crude fractional distillation where the low Ge concentration led to Ge losses to the
HPS product and Chlorine Recovery waste.
The
overall recovery of Al was dictated by the carbo-chlorination unit kinetics. Aluminum availability was based on kaolinite conversion
to meta-kaolinite in the ROM roaster and coking furnace, limited to 95% in the former. Only meta-kaolinite was then expected to chlorinate
in the carbo-chlorination unit, at an 80% conversion rate. This resulted in un-reacted kaolinite and meta-kaolinite being disposed of
in the Residue Management area. The overall Al recovery as HPA was 0.8%.
The
overall Si recovery was also based on the quartz removal and the carbo-chlorination unit. Quartz removal in the Physical Separation area
decreased the Si feed to the carbo-chlorination units. Only meta-kaolinite-bound Si was expected to be chlorinated and as such the remaining
un-reacted kaolinite, meta-kaolinite, and quartz were disposed in the Residue Management or the Chlorine Recovery areas. The Si recovery
as HPS was intentionally 2%.
All
elemental deportments will need to be confirmed by test work in later phases.
H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0
Page 2-21
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026
2.5.2 Utility
Recovery
Raw
water is planned to be sourced from a well, making its consumption an area of concern. The overall water balance for the plant is summarized
in Table 2-4. Current raw water consumption is at 385.4 t / h. To be noted, the preliminary air separation plant budgetary quote from
Messer indicated a make-up water demand of 200 gpm (~45 t/h) and water waste discharge of 100 gpm (~22.5 t/h) that are excluded from
the values presented in Table 2-4.
Table
2-4: Overall Water Balance for the Brook Mine Process Plant.
Water
Input
Water
Output
Source
Flow
(t / h)
Destination
Flow
(t / h)
Raw
Water
385.4
Cooling
Tower
312.1
ROM
Feed
25.7
ROM
Roaster Off-Gas Treatment Vent
60.1
NaOH
Reagent (50 wt.%)
4.5
Rejected
Quartz Cake
18.4
Coal
Feed
4.0
Waste
ZLD Dryer Vent
11.4
HCl
Reagent (35 wt.%)
1.2
Boiler
9.3
TBP
(99 wt.%)
4.39x10-6
Coking
Off-Gas Treatment Vent
7.4
Waste
ZLD Cake
3.2
Carbo-Chlorination
Off-Gas Treatment Vent
2.2
Other
Outputs
0.1
Total
In
420.8
Total
Out
424.1
Difference
3.26
Water
Generated (in reaction blocks)
3.34
Water
Consumed (in reaction blocks)
0.08
Overall
Difference
0.000
Primary
water losses are due to the cooling tower blowdown, drift and evaporation losses. Standard evaporative cooling tower assumptions were
used in the model and will require confirmation from vendors. Alternative cooling tower technologies may need to be investigated to reduce
these losses. Similarly, boiler water losses are due to pressure let down and boiler blowdown, with the latter requiring confirmation
from vendors.
Other
water losses were from off-gas treatment scrubbers and unrecovered water vapour from calciners, dryers and roasters. Due to the moisture
content in the waste cakes (5 wt.% and 25 wt.% for the rejected quartz and ZLD cake, respectively), additional water is also lost in
those streams. Filtration test work and vendor technology may be able to decrease water losses in cake moisture. The water flowrates
include any bound water that may be present (ex. Al2O3∙2SiO2∙2H2O, [REE]2CO3∙xH2O).
Release or formation of bound water is assumed to not impact water generation/consumption.
H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0
Page 2-22
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026
For
a detailed utilities breakdown on the:
● Process
water consumption, refer to Table 2-5
● DI
water usage, refer to Table 2-6
● Cooling
water usage and return, refer to Table 2-7
● Steam
usage and condensate return, refer to Table 2-8.
2.5.2.1 Process
Water
Process
water is used in the system when the purity is not the primary concern or as alternative cooling medium for high temperature areas. Table
2-5 provides a detailed breakdown and rationale for the major process water users and recovery sources.
Table
2-5: Overview of Process Water Usage and Recovery.
Description
Flow
(t / h)
Addition
Rationale
Process
Water Users
De-Sublimation
1 (Alkali)1
486.2
Maintain
operating temperature at 400°C
Cooling
Tower
312.1
Evaporation/drift/blowdown
losses (6.2%)
De-Sublimation
2 (Ferric Removal)1
231.4
Maintain
operating temperature at 280°C
Mineral
Process Water
108.9
Make
up water loss to purge (2.5%)
Water
Leaching
87.8
40%
solids in feed and 0.5 t / t dry solids wash ratio
Carbo-Chlorination
Off-Gas Treatment
66.5
NaOH
solution diluent used to neutralize SO2 and dissolve HCl
Roaster
Off-Gas Treatment
54.3
NaOH
solution diluent used to neutralize SO2
Coking
Off-Gas Treatment
37.4
NaOH
solution diluent used to neutralize SO2
Al-Sc
Hydroxide Precipitation Filters
0.2
0.5
t/t dry solids
Total
Process Water Usage
1,384.8
Process
Water Recovery
Return
from De-Sublimation 1
486.2
Return
from De-Sublimation 1
Return
from De-Sublimation 2
231.4
Return
from De-Sublimation 2
ZLD
Condensate
225.8
ZLD
Condensate
ROM
Dryer Condensate
47.7
ROM
Dryer Condensate
Water
Evaporator Condensate
39.3
Water
Evaporator Condensate
Total
Process Water Recovered
1,030.5
Make-Up
Raw Water
354.3
Excluding
make-up to DI water package
1 Process
water was used as cooling medium for both the de-sublimation unit 1 and 2 instead of cooling
water due to the high unit operating temperatures.
H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0
Page 2-23
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026
Any
water condensate from the MVR systems (ZLD System and Water Evaporator) is treated as process water and may no longer meet the purity
requirement for the steam boiler, therefore it is treated as process water. Raw water is required to make up the difference in recovered
to usage demand.
2.5.2.2 DI
Water
As
discussed in Section 2.3.2.1, DI water is used when there are concerns about product purity and impurity entrainment. Table 2-6 provides
a detailed breakdown on the DI water usage. The process water make-up flow presented does not account for any waste streams generated
from the DI water treatment package.
Table
2-6: Overview of DI Water Users.
Description
Flow
(t / h)
Addition
Rationale
Boiler
Condensate Make-Up
24.7
Blowdown
losses (5%)
Gallium
Stripping
1.8
O:A
ratio of 20:1
Scandium
Solvent Extraction (Stripping)
1.7
O:A
ratio of 10:1
Scandium
Solvent Extraction (Washing)
1.1
O:A
ratio of 15:1
Other
Users
1.9
Total
DI Water Usage
31.1
Process
Water Make-Up
31.1
DI
water is used in the steam boiler to reduce scaling and in the SX circuits to reduce crud formation. The “Other Users” category
accounts for water consumption for various filtration, dilution, and re-pulping steps necessary for critical mineral production.
2.5.2.3 Cooling
Water
Cooling
water is used throughout the plant to regulate unit operating temperatures and condense vapours. All used cooling water is returned to
the cooling tower and process water is used as make-up source to account for cooling tower losses. A detailed breakdown of the cooling
water usage is summarized below in Table 2-7.
H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0
Page 2-24
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026
Table
2-7: Overview of Cooling Water Users.
Description
Flow
(t / h)
Addition
Rationale
Stage
2 Oxidizer
1311.5
Discharge
temperature of 1000°C
Process
Water Cooler
809.3
Discharge
temperature of 50°C
ROM
Dryer Condenser
528.7
Condense
water present in vent
Al-Ga
De-Sublimator Discharge Cooler
482.0
Discharge
temperature of 55°C
Chlorinated
ROM Cooler
458.1
Discharge
temperature of 100°C
Chlorine
Quench Condenser
332.7
Discharge
temperature of 50°C
Crude
Fractional Distillation Columns
225.3
Maintain
temperature profiles of the two-stage system
Chlorination
Off-Gas Separation Pre-Condenser
170.6
Discharge
temperature of 56.8°C
Al-Ga
De-Sublimator Pre-Cooler
161.0
Discharge
temperature of 150°C
Water
Leach Evaporator Cooler
66.6
Discharge
temperature of 50°C
Hexane
Condenser
44.7
Condense
hexane present in off-gas
Water
Leach Recirculation Cooler
41.8
Maintain
operating temperature of 80°C
SiCl4
Pyrolysis Reactor
32.5
Maintain
operating temperature of 1200°C
Silica
Product Cooler
18.8
Discharge
temperature of 70°C
HCl-Azeotropic
Still
57.2
Maintain
temperature profile (76 - 108°C)
Other
Users
7.3
Total
Cooling Water Usage
4748.3
Make-up
Process Water
312.1
Evaporation/drift/blowdown
losses (6.2%)
Total
Water to Cooling Tower
5060.3
2.5.2.4 Steam
Steam
is used as the heating medium in dryers, distillation columns, and MVR systems. A detailed breakdown of the steam users and condensate
return is summarized in Table 2-8.
H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0
Page 2-25
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 2 - Process Definition - July 28, 2026
Table
2-8: Overview of Steam Usage and Condensate Return.
Steam
Destination
Flow
(t/h)
Addition
Rationale
Steam
Users
ROM
Dryer
62.8
Heat
source to maintain 120°C
Waste
ZLD MVR System
13.4
Make-up
duty source
Crude
Fractional Distillation Columns
11.2
Maintain
temperature profiles of the two-stage system
Boiler
Loss
4.7
Boiler
blowdown loss (5%)
Steam
Condensate Pressure Letdown
4.5
Letdown
pressure to atmospheric
Water
Leach Evaporation MVR System
2.0
Make-up
duty source
Total
Steam Usage
98.7
Condensate
Returns
Condensate
from ROM Dryer
62.8
Condensate
from Crude Fractional Distillation
11.2
Total
Condensate Recovery
74.0
DI
Water Make-Up
24.7
Steam
sent to MVR systems are recovered as process water.
Significant
DI water make up is required due to the condensates from MVR systems not being returned to the boiler. MVR systems combine steam with
process vapour and, as such, the combined condensate no longer meets the purity requirement for boilers. The MVR condensate is instead
used as process water within the plant.
H376597-0000-100-146-0001_SE02, Rev. 0
Page 2-26
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
Ramaco
Resources
Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial
Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate
2026-07-28
0
Issued
for Use
D.
Estrada
V.
Tillous
F.
Delgado
Date
Rev.
Status
Prepared
By
Checked
By
Approved
By
Approved
By
Client
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
Important
notice to reader
This
report (the “Report”), has been prepared by Hatch Ltd. (“Hatch”) for the sole and exclusive use of Ramaco Resources
(the “Client”) for the purpose of assisting the management of the Client with respect to Brook Mine Rare Earth Project (the
“Asset”) must not be used for any other purpose. Hatch does not accept and disclaimers any and all responsibility and liability
arising from any use or reliance on this Report by any third party, or any modification or misuse of this Report.
1. This
report contains opinions, conclusions and recommendations made by Hatch, using its professional
judgment and reasonable care. Estimates have been prepared by Hatch, using its professional
judgment and exercising due care consistent with the agreed level of accuracy. Any use of
or reliance upon this report and estimate by Client is subject to the following conditions:
a. The
report and estimates being read in the context of and subject to the terms of the Consultant
Service Agreement between Hatch and Ramaco Resources (the “Agreement”), including
any methodologies, procedures, techniques, assumptions and other relevant terms or conditions
that were specified or agreed therein;
b. The
report, including the estimates contained herein, being read as a whole, with sections
or parts hereof read or relied upon in context;
c. The
conditions of the site may change over time (or may have already changed) due to natural
forces or human intervention, and Hatch takes no responsibility for the impact that such
changes may have on the accuracy or validity or the observations, conclusions and recommendations
set out in this report; and
d. The
estimate is based on several factors over which Hatch has no control, including without limitation
site conditions, cost and availability of inputs, etc., and Hatch takes no responsibility
for the impact that changes to these factors may have on the accuracy or validity or this
estimate.
e. This
report is a Scoping Study and, accordingly, all estimates and projections contained herein
are based on limited and incomplete data. Therefore, while the work, results, estimates and
projections herein may be considered to be generally indicative of the nature and quality
of the Project, they are not definitive. No representations or predictions are intended as
to the results of future work, nor can there be any promises that the estimates and projections
in this report will be sustained in future work.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0
Page 3-i
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
2. The
report and estimates are based on information made available to Hatch by the Client or by
certain third parties, and unless stated otherwise in the report, Hatch has not verified
the accuracy, completeness or validity of such information, makes no representation regarding
its accuracy and hereby disclaims any liability in connection therewith.
3. Any
use of this report by any third party is at that party’s sole risk, and neither Hatch
nor any of its directors, officers or employees shall have any liability to any third party
for such use for any reason, including negligence.
4. This
Report is subject to the State of Wyoming and the city of Sherida, Wyoming and all disputes
will be submitted to the International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”) for resolution
in accordance with its rules then in force. The arbitration will be held in English and in
the city of Sheridan, Wyoming or such other location the parties may agree.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0
Page 3-ii
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
Table
of Contents
3.
Capital Cost Estimate Basis
3-1
3.1
Introduction
3-1
3.2
Acronyms and Abbreviations
3-1
3.3
Project and phase description
3-1
3.4
Estimate Summary
3-1
3.4.1
Estimate Summary by WBS
3-1
3.4.2
Summary by Trade
3-3
3.4.3
Accuracy Statement
3-4
3.5
Estimating Tools
3-4
3.5.1
Exclusions, Assumptions and Qualifications
3-4
3.6
Structure & Coding
3-6
3.6.1
Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)
3-6
3.6.2
Trade Codes
3-6
3.7
Direct Costs
3-7
3.7.1
Basis by Commodity
3-7
3.7.2
Labor
3-12
3.8
Indirect cost
3-13
3.8.1
Temporary construction facilities and services
3-13
3.8.2
Freight and Logistics
3-14
3.8.3
EPCM
3-14
3.8.4
Spare parts
3-15
3.8.5
Vendor’s representatives at site
3-15
3.8.6
First Fills
3-15
3.8.7
Pre-Operational Testing
3-15
3.9
Owner Costs
3-16
3.10
Contingency
3-16
3.11
OoM estimate for 2.6 MTPA capacity plant
3-17
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0
Page 3-iii
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
List
of Table
Table 3-1:
List of Acronyms
3-1
Table 3-2:
Estimate Summary by WBS level 2
3-2
Table 3-3:
Estimate Summary by Trade
3-3
Table 3-4:
Trade Codes Used
3-6
Table 3-5:
Mechanical equipment and tanks supply cost
by source of information
3-7
Table 3-6:
Summary of equipment supply by type of equipment
3-8
Table 3-7:
Buildings cost summary
3-9
Table 3-8:
Owner’s Costs summary
3-16
Table 3-9:
Order of Magnitude Estimate for Expansion
3-18
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0
Page 3-iv
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
3. Capital
Cost Estimate Basis
3.1 Introduction
This
document was prepared by the Project Estimating Manager on behalf of the Project Manager.
The
audience for this document includes the Project Owner, Project Manager, Business Unit Owner, and those parties that need to understand
the approach taken to develop the Capital Cost Estimate.
The
purpose of this document is to report the estimate results for the Initial Assessment study phase, the methodology used and the premises
and information taken into account.
3.2 Acronyms
and Abbreviations
The
Table 3-1 below provides a list of acronyms and their corresponding full forms used throughout this document for reference.
Table
3-1: List of Acronyms
Acronym
Full
Form
AACE
Association
for the Advancement of Cost Engineering
BoE
Basis
of Estimate
BoP
Balance
of Plant
USD
United
States Dollars
CAPEX
Capital
Expenditure
CM
Construction
Management
EP
Engineering
and Procurement
MTO
Material
Take-Off
PPE
Personal
Protective Equipment
Q1,
Q2, Q3, Q4
First
Quarter, Second Quarter, Third Quarter, Fourth Quarter
QRA
Quantitative
Risk Assessment
TBD
To
be discussed
WBS
Work
Breakdown Structure
3.3 Project
and phase description
For
project phase and description, please review Section 1 of this report.
3.4 Estimate
Summary
3.4.1 Estimate
Summary by WBS
The table below presents the results of the estimate by physical
and intangible area using the work breakdown structure agreed with Ramaco at level 2.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0
Page 3-1
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
Table
3-2: Estimate Summary by WBS level 2
WBS
Code
WBS
description
Total
Cost
(MUSD)
1000
General
- Project Wide
49.56
1100
Site
Preparations
49.56
2000
Site
Preparations and Infrastructure
131.67
2200
Site
Power Distribution
39.32
2300
Fuel,
Steam, Air and Cooling Water Systems
25.18
2400
Water
and Sewage Systems
43.33
2500
Raw
Material, Product and By-product Storage
-
2600
Laboratory
5.00
2700
Non-Process
Buildings
18.84
3000
Beneficiation
294.59
3100
Physical
Separation
130.96
3200
Pre-Treatment
163.63
4000
Process
Plant
791.20
4100
Carbo-Chlorination
237.46
4200
Critical
Mineral Recovery
247.62
4300
Rare
Earth Recovery
77.86
4400
Tailings
Filtration and Storage
-
4500
Residue
Management
200.10
4600
Chlorine
Recovery
20.16
4700
Product
Handling & Packaging
8.00
4900
Process
Building(s)
0.00
5000
Reagents
Storage and Supply
29.48
5100
Liquid
Reagents
4.17
5200
Solid
Reagents
2.28
5300
Gas
Reagents
13.80
5400
Reagents
Unloading Station
3.00
5900
Reagent
Building(s)
-
6000
Offsite
Infrastructure and Facilities (out of Hatch Scope)
-
6100
Site
Access
-
6200
Utilities
-
6300
Accommodations
Camp
-
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0
Page 3-2
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
WBS
Code
WBS
description
Total
Cost
(MUSD)
DC
Direct
Cost
1,296.49
7000
Indirects
440.45
7100
Temporary
Construction Facilities and Services
90.75
7200
Freight
50.99
7300
EPCM
233.37
7400
Miscellaneous
45.89
7500
Pre-Operational
Testing
19.45
DC+IC
Direct
+ Indirect Cost
1,736.94
8000
Contingency
521.08
9000
Owners
Costs
327.02
TIC
Total
Installed Cost
2,585.05
3.4.2 Summary
by Trade
The
summary by trade or discipline applied to the current stage of the project is shown below:
Table
3-3: Estimate Summary by Trade
Code
Trade
Description
Total
Cost
(MCAD)
A
Site
development
49.56
CSE
Structural
support
58.19
F
Buildings
246.76
J
Instrumentation
and controls
59.64
L
Electrical
equipment and bulks
214.53
M
Mechanical
equipment
519.13
N
Tanks
25.65
P
Piping,
fittings, valves and insulation
106.53
X
Multidiscipline
allowances
16.50
DC
Total
Direct Cost
1,296.49
Y
Indirect
Cost
440.45
IC
Total
Project Indirect Costs
440.45
DC+IC
Direct
+ Indirect Cost
1,736.94
Z
Contingency
521.08
V
Owner’s
Costs
327.02
TIC
Total
Installed Cost
2,585.05
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0
Page 3-3
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
3.4.3 Accuracy
Statement
The
capital cost estimate was prepared in accordance with the AACE guidelines for a Scope Study: Class 5 estimate, with an intended accuracy
range of -30% to +50%.
The
estimate is based on very limited information, equipment sizing, and a chosen region but not exact location. Major mechanical equipment
and tanks have been listed and priced. All other costs are factored and derived of the equipment supply cost. More details will be provided
in the following sections.
3.5 Estimating
Tools
The
estimate was produced in MS Excel and delivered in pdf format. A copy of the estimate details and summaries are provided in MS Excel
format.
3.5.1 Exclusions,
Assumptions and Qualifications
The
capital cost estimate was compiled based on the following assumptions and qualifications:
● Discipline
Mechanical equipment list (MEL) for mechanical equipment. Preliminary vendor’s quotes
for key equipment packages, all other equipment was priced according with Hatch in-house
database or using allowances when the capacity of the equipment is indetermined.
● Factored
installation from equipment supply cost according with benchmarks in the region.
● Electrical
equipment and bulks, Piping, insulation, instrumentation and controls, civil and structural
works cost was calculated as allowances, factored consistently with benchmarks for other
projects similar facilities or areas.
● A
preliminary layout was created for the Initial Assessment study, the preliminary size of
buildings and process areas were provided.
● The
indirect costs were introduced as allowances factored from direct cost or equipment supply
cost where applicable.
● The
estimate base date is Q2 2026.
● All
costs are provided in US Dollars; the estimate is presented in US Dollars.
● The
estimate is nominal to the base date and currency. Escalation and currency fluctuations beyond
the base date are excluded.
● None
of the prices is based on contracts of biding quotations.
3.5.1.1 Exclusions
● Given
the non-specific site location of the plant, no information was provided for the excavations
and fills needed to level the surface. For estimation purposes only, the site is assumed
to be levelled. Not massive excavations and fills are considered to provide an even terrain
for construction. This assumption requires review after the location of the plant is defined
and the preparations efforts are quantified.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0
Page 3-4
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
● The
need of deep foundations as piles is excluded. A geotechnical report is being prepared at
the moment. After the results of the geotechnical investigation and recommendations are provided,
this assumption will be reviewed.
● Construction
centralized camp and operation camp have been excluded.
● The
cost of infrastructure and equipment to provide feedstocks, power, fuel, gas, potable and
demineralized water, and reagents outside of the boundary of the project is excluded (Transmission
lines, reagents plant, gas pipeline, etc.). These costs are covered under Owner’s Cost
as indicated by Ramaco.
● The
cost of stack areas and stockpiling facilities is excluded.
● Pre-Commercial
production costs that occur after facilities are handed over to the owner are excluded.
● Sustaining
capital costs and closure costs are excluded (client has indicated that these costs are being
considered in the Financial Model, prepared by Ramaco). The capital cost estimate is limited
to costs relating to project construction and complete pre-operational testing tills hot
commissioning.
● Estimate
is based on EPCM or Design – Bid – Build execution model and excludes any risk
premium or subcontractor’s fees associated with an EPC model.
● Land
purchase and rentals are excluded from Hatch’s scope. This exclusion also considers
the land needed for final disposal of unused material produced from excavations (considered
under Owner’s cost provided by Ramaco).
● Any
cost related to environmental evaluation, permitting and mitigation projects is excluded
(considered under Owner’s Cost provided by Ramaco).
● Financial
costs and Insurances are excluded (considered under Owner’s Cost provided by Ramaco).
● Escalation
beyond the base date.
● Impacts
of foreign currency exchange rate variations are excluded.
● Allowances
for significant changes to the scope of the project are excluded.
● Management
reserves are excluded for risks events not contemplated in contingency such as non-predictable
variations in market conditions that could affect equipment, commodities and / or labour
costs, labour unrest, disputes with residents, geotechnical or process related design issues,
delays due to the considerably late receipt of equipment or materials, significant poor performance
by contractors, force majeure, etc.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0
Page 3-5
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
● Allowances
are excluded for the risks associated with the US political, legal, or regulatory environment,
including:
♦ The
risk of changes to any laws, regulations, rules, or policies, or the governmental or judicial
interpretation thereof
♦ The
risk of the client failing to comply with any such laws, regulations, rules or policies and
the costs of any resulting penalties, fines, suits, etc.
♦ The
risk of the client not being able to obtain or maintain any permits, licenses and other authorisations
required for the project or construction.
● Any
other exclusion stated in this document.
3.6 Structure
& Coding
3.6.1 Work
Breakdown Structure (WBS)
The
WBS is a logical division and sub-division of the work into a 1 to 4-level hierarchical manner. Within the WBS, the Project is divided
into Areas, Facilities, and Sub-facilities or Systems. For the present study only a WBS at level 3 have been developed to identify equipment
in different process areas.
3.6.2 Trade
Codes
Commodity
Codes are used to collect the estimate items into groups of work of a similar nature or discipline. The standard Commodity Code is an
alpha character which is directly aligned with the project standard discipline descriptions.
Table
3-4: Trade Codes Used
Trade
Code
Trade
A
Site
development
CSE
Structural
support
F
Buildings
J
Instrumentation
and controls
L
Electrical
equipment and bulks
M
Mechanical
equipment
N
Tanks
P
Piping,
fittings, valves and insulation
X
Multidiscipline
allowances
Y
Indirect
Costs
Z
Contingency
V
Owner’s
Costs
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0
Page 3-6
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
3.7 Direct
Costs
Direct
costs include all the permanent equipment, materials and labor associated with the physical construction of the permanent facility /
asset, and includes:
● Supply,
assembly, and installation of permanent equipment and tanks
● Supply,
fabrication, and installation of bulk materials
● Supplemental
resources for equipment and bulk material installation, such as labor and construction equipment
● Site
preparations and the construction of ancillary facilities and systems
● Supply,
fabrication and erection of permanent buildings and associated services
● Contractor’s
distributable costs such as mobilization and demobilization, overheads and profit, supervision,
general construction equipment including construction cranes, small tools and consumables
used in construction, etc.
In
the following sections the basis of Direct Cost is explained.
3.7.1 Basis
by Commodity
3.7.1.1 Mechanical
costs
Mechanical
costs consist of permanent equipment, tanks, and the associated labor and material costs required to install them.
A
Mechanical Equipment List (MEL) was provided by engineering including capacity and construction materials when was possible a determination.
This
list was priced using budgetary quotes from vendors, in-house database from recent projects with similar needs. When the capacity was
undetermined an allowance was included according with recent estimate experience.
All
equipment costs of reference from previous projects were escalated to the base date (Q2 2026).
This
is the equipment supply cost distributed according with the source of information:
Table
3-5: Mechanical equipment and tanks supply
cost by source of information
Source
MUSD
%
of total supply
Quote
67.11
18%
Database
253.77
69%
Allowances
47.76
13%
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0
Page 3-7
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
It
was considered that some of the equipment needed to complete the balance of plant is not listed. To cover that cost, a factor between
5% and 10% was applied to the equipment listed cost in each area.
Table
3-6: Summary of equipment supply by type of equipment
Equipment
Total
supply cost MUSD
%
of the total supply cost
Fluid
Bed Roaster
116.07
31%
Crystallizer
Packages
35.07
10%
Cylindrical
Tanks
18.47
5%
Flame
Reactor
17.65
5%
Fluid
Bed Reactors
14.17
4%
Filter
Press
12.69
3%
Cyclones
10.42
3%
Paddle
Coolers
9.56
3%
Heat
Exchanger Coolers
9.28
3%
Water
Treatment Package
7.29
2%
GAC
Columns
7.00
2%
Rotary
Dryers
5.93
2%
Venturi
Scrubbers
5.17
1%
Centrifugal
Pumps
5.15
1%
Evaporator
Package
4.67
1%
Distillation
Columns
4.50
1%
Plate
Magnets
4.00
1%
Mixer
Settlers
3.12
1%
Belt
Conveyors
3.03
1%
De-Sublimators
3.00
1%
Bagging
Systems
3.00
1%
Rotary
Kilns
2.50
1%
Other
listed equipment
35.33
10%
Non-listed
equipment
31.57
9%
The
installation was calculated as a factor of the Equipment cost as follows:
● 30%
factor for Mechanical equipment isolated or non-modular and Tanks
● 15%
factor for modular equipment.
Labor
inclusions are stated in 3.7.2.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0
Page 3-8
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
3.7.1.2 Buildings
and major structures
A
layout and model was developed at the Initial Assessment study phase containing the preliminary footprint of buildings. The size and
conditions per building was provided to estimation and a parametrical calculation of structural steel, concrete, cladding, foundation
excavations and fills, roofing and architectural finishes cost was prepared. The resulting cost per square foot was applied to the buildings
footprint to obtain the their cost.
Table
3-7: Buildings cost summary
Building
/ Structure
Conditions
Length
(ft)
Width
(ft)
Height
(ft)
Total
Cost
(MUSD)
INSTRUMENT
AIR SYSTEM
Warehouse
Structure Building
96
42
32
2.09
STEAM
GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION
Open
structure supporting equipment
96
32
32
1.13
COOLING
WATER SYSTEM
Open
structure supporting equipment
192
96
64
7.38
DEIONIZED
WATER PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
Open
structure supporting equipment
32
32
32
0.38
PROCESS
WATER AND CONDENSATE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
Open
structure supporting equipment
192
192
96
15.30
FIRE
WATER SYSTEM
Open
structure supporting equipment
96
64
64
2.46
GATE
HOUSE
Single
Story Building
64
45
13
0.75
ADMINISTRATION
BUILDING
Single
Story Building
385
80
13
7.93
WAREHOUSE
BUILDING - PARTS/ PRODUCT STORAGE
Warehouse
Structure Building with 5T crane
199
64
26
6.22
MAINTENANCE
SHOP
Warehouse
Structure Building with 5T crane
122
64
26
3.94
STOCKPILE-SURGE
BUILDING-ROM
Warehouse
Structure Building
199
225
71
29.86
STOCKPILE-SURGE
BUILDING-COAL
Warehouse
Structure Building
160
154
51
13.64
WET
SCRUBBING
Open
structure supporting equipment
80
64
32
1.89
FLOTATION
Open
structure supporting equipment
96
112
38
3.54
THICKENING
AND DEWATERING
Open
structure supporting equipment
212
176
64
13.63
MINERAL
PROCESS WATER SYSTEM
Outdoor
tanks
160
96
2.09
DRYING
(KAOLINITE)
Open
structure supporting equipment
64
32
32
0.81
CALCINING
(KAOLINITE)
Open
structure supporting equipment
64
32
64
0.82
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0
Page 3-9
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
Building
/ Structure
Conditions
Length
(ft)
Width
(ft)
Height
(ft)
Total
Cost
(MUSD)
ROASTER
OFF-GAS SYSTEM
Open
structure supporting equipment
160
96
160
9.29
COKING
(COAL)
Open
structure supporting equipment
48
32
16
0.44
COKING
OFF-GAS SYSTEM
Open
structure supporting equipment
64
64
160
2.48
CARBO-CHLORINATION
Open
structure supporting equipment
128
96
51
4.68
DE-SUBLIMATION
1 (AKALI SALT REMOVAL)
Open
structure supporting equipment
48
32
64
0.62
DE-SUBLIMATION
2 (FERRIC REMOVAL)
Open
structure supporting equipment
80
48
64
1.54
DE-SUBLIMATION
3 (Al/Ga REMOVAL)
Open
structure supporting equipment
96
64
64
2.46
OFF-GAS
SEPARATION
Open
structure supporting equipment
96
64
64
2.46
GALLIUM
SEPARATION & RECOVERY
Open
structure supporting equipment
96
64
32
2.26
ALUMINA
SEPARATION & RECOVERY
Open
structure supporting equipment
64
64
48
1.51
GERMANIUM
SEPARATION & RECOVERY
Open
structure supporting equipment
32
32
16
0.29
SILICA
SEPARATION & RECOVERY
Open
structure supporting equipment
128
64
48
3.02
WATER
LEACHING
Open
structure supporting equipment
321
128
128
20.74
Al-Sc
HYDROXIDE RECOVERY
Open
structure supporting equipment
96
64
32
2.26
SCANDIUM
SEPARATION
Open
structure supporting equipment
128
32
32
1.51
SCANDIUM
OXIDE PRODUCTION
Open
structure supporting equipment
64
32
16
0.58
RARE
EARTH SEPARATION
Open
structure supporting equipment
96
48
32
1.70
MREC
PRODUCTION
Open
structure supporting equipment
96
64
32
2.26
ZLD
NEUTRALIZATION, EVAPORATION AND DRYING
Open
structure supporting equipment
417
257
96
44.19
n-DODECANE
CRUD GTREATMENT
Open
structure supporting equipment
96
64
64
2.46
Sc
EXTRACTANT CRUD TREAMENT
Open
structure supporting equipment
96
64
64
2.39
RESIDUE
OXIDATION
Open
structure supporting equipment
128
64
64
3.28
REAGENTS
STORAGE AND SUPPLY
Warehouse
Structure Building with 5T crane
199
64
26
6.22
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0
Page 3-10
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
Building
/ Structure
Conditions
Length
(ft)
Width
(ft)
Height
(ft)
Total
Cost
(MUSD)
LIQUID
REAGENT STORAGE AND SUPPLY - HYDROXIDE ACID
Outdoor
tanks
32
32
32
0.14
LIQUID
REAGENT STORAGE AND SUPPLY - SODIUM HYDROXIDE
Outdoor
tanks
38
38
38
0.20
LIQUID
REAGENT STORAGE AND SUPPLY - KEROSENE
Outdoor
tanks
16
16
16
0.03
LIQUID
REAGENT STORAGE AND SUPPLY - HEXANE
Outdoor
tanks
26
26
26
0.09
GAS
REAGENT STORAGE AND SUPPLY
Warehouse
Structure Building with 5T crane / To be provided by gas reagent operator - Just foundations needed
513
199
64
13.80
3.7.1.3 Disciplines
cost
All
costs associated to other disciplines apart from Mechanical equipment and process plateworks was factored from the total equipment and
tanks installed cost as follows:
3.7.1.3.1 Site
preparations:
This
cost includes:
● Civil
works needed to prepare the site for the construction (excluded massive excavation and fills,
blasting or any work needed to remove slopes, fill ponds or any considerable unevenness in
the terrain).
● Internal
roads, sidewalks, fences, gates, ponds and exterior lighting.
The
allowance used to cover these works is 10% of Equipment installed cost, in accordance with the cost benchmarked in processing plants
of similar size.
3.7.1.3.2 Equipment
structural support:
Inside
buildings and in the exterior, concrete footings, containment areas, platforms, hangers, handrails, ladders and pipe-racks are needed
to support the equipment and tanks.
To
cover the cost of supports not accounted in the Table 3-7: Buildings cost summary, a factor between 5% to 20% was applied to the equipment
installed cost per area according to Hatch in-house benchmarking.
3.7.1.3.3 Electrical
equipment and bulks:
This
cost includes:
● Supply,
install and testing electrical equipment to distribute power and protections across the plant
● Supply
and install of complete e-houses inside the plant
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0
Page 3-11
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
● Supply
and install of all the power cable, grounding system, lightning protection to distribute
power across the plant
● Supply
and install of All the trays, conduits, duct banks and accessories needed to protect and
support the power cable.
A
factor between 25% and 40% was applied to the equipment installed cost to account for the electrical equipment and bulks cost, according
to Hatch in-house benchmarking.
3.7.1.3.4 Piping
and insulation
This
cost includes:
● Supply
and installation of all the pipelines and pipes inside the plant not included in equipment
packages. Including fittings and special pieces, coating when needed, testing and finishings.
● Supply
and installation of all the flow in-line valves.
● Supply
and installation of all the insulation needed for piping.
A
factor between 10% and 30% was applied to the equipment installed cost to account for the piping and insulation cost, according to Hatch
in-house benchmarking.
3.7.1.3.5 Instrumentation
and controls
This
cost includes:
● Supply
and installation of all the devices need to monitor and control the process, excluded those
that are included in equipment packages
● Supply
and installation of materials needed for the correct functioning of instrumentation, panels,
cable, fiber optic, conduits, etc.
● Supply
and installation of communication and monitoring system, DCS, including CCTV and other circuits
not associated with the process
● Complete
plant programing and integration.
A
factor of 15% was applied to the equipment installed cost to account for the piping and insulation cost.
3.7.2 Labor
The
labor all-in cost is the summary of workforce, construction equipment and contractor’s distributable cost. It represents contractor’s
installation and fabrication rates. In the present estimate the labor was either factored from equipment supply cost or included in general
discipline factors.
The
labor cost includes the following:
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0
Page 3-12
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
● Fully
burdened workforce (including vacations, payroll, benefits, overtime)
● Construction
equipment including operation (rentals, fuel, maintenance, insurances)
● Contractor’s
distributable, or contractor’s indirect costs such us:
♦ Personal
Protection Equipment (PPE) for the direct and indirect workers
♦ Small
tools and consumables
♦ Living
Out Allowance (LOA) for workers coming from locations beyond 60 km from the work site
♦ Supervision
at site
♦ Indirect
support labor
♦ Temporary
trailers and other facilities required
♦ Office
support
♦ HSE
and quality control
♦ Insurances
♦ Overhead
♦ Profit.
Work
regime considered: The work regime to consider must be studied in the following phase, with a clear view of the percentages of workers
coming from Sheridan and other locations.
For
the purpose of the estimate, following the benchmarks used, approximately 50% of the workers are in an extended regime of 10 hrs per
day, 6 days per week (Local labor) and 50% are in an extended regime of 10 hrs per day, 2 weeks on-site and one week of-site.
No
centralized construction camp have been included in the cost.
3.8 Indirect
cost
Indirect
costs were estimated as factored allowances based on historical information from large size projects in North America, adjusted to account
for site specific conditions.
A
description of what is included in the indirect costs is presented below:
3.8.1 Temporary
construction facilities and services
The
cost associated with the temporary facilities covers the following items:
● Construction
area development including temporary diversion ditching, laydown / staging areas, material
borrow quarries and stockpiles, temporary roads, etc.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0
Page 3-13
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
● The
supply and installation of temporary utilities infrastructure such as for water, power, fuel
storage and distribution
● Temporary
buildings, such as, offices and trailers for managing and owner’s team, ablution blocks,
etc.
● Site
office supplies, furniture
● Communications
systems and local area network required to support the site construction activities.
The
cost associated with the temporary construction Services covers the following items:
● Costs
for electrical energy to be used during construction
● Administration,
warehousing, cleaning and maintenance services
● Communications
services (phone and internet) required during construction and
pre-operational testing
● Security
● Water
distribution during construction
● Medical
services (Emergencies and controls)
● Mobile
equipment in warehouses and workshops
● Heavy
lift cranes (not in the scope of contractors).
The
cost of temporary facilities and services have been calculated as 7% of Direct Cost.
3.8.2 Freight
and Logistics
The
Freight and Logistics covers costs for the transportation of equipment (Mechanical, tanks and electrical) from the anticipated market
to the plant site.
A
cost of 10% of equipment supply was included in the estimate to cover the transport, storage and handling of the equipment. This factor
is consistent with a combination of equipment obtained in the country and some packages from other continents. After vendor’s or
region of supply selection a more detailed study can be done.
This
cost of freight does not includes tariffs or duties applied to the equipment import.
3.8.3 EPCM
It
is assumed that equipment supply packages will be grouped as set out in the project execution strategy and that established construction
contractors will be engaged to complete the site work.
The
cost for EPCM services covers the following:
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0
Page 3-14
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
● Preliminary
studies such as Pre-feasibility study, feasibility study and basic engineering.
● Detailed
engineering
● Procurement
of equipment, materials, and contracts
● Construction
management
● Project
controls / reporting
● Project
administration
● Health,
Safety and Environmental requirements
● QA/QC
● Office
expenses, communication, IT services, etc.
● Travel
costs associated with the EPCM team.
The
cost of EPCM was estimated as 15% of the Direct Cost.
3.8.4 Spare
parts
The
equipment spare parts to be used during commissioning and critical spare parts were included in the estimate as 3.5% of equipment supply
cost.
3.8.5 Vendor’s
representatives at site
In
some cases, to fulfil the requirement of equipment manufacturer’s warranties and guarantees, selected manufacturers require their
representatives to complete an inspection of their equipment prior to it being placed into operation.
Cost
for vendor representatives to be on site during construction and/or pre-operational testing, depending on the nature of the equipment
have been included in the estimate as 1.5% of equipment supply cost.
3.8.6 First
Fills
The
cost of common and expected fill consumables to be using during pre-operational testing and commissioning. This cost excludes feedstock
and reagents, and was calculated as 1% of the equipment supply cost.
3.8.7 Pre-Operational
Testing
Costs
for Pre-Operation Testing covers planning and supervision services during commissioning. The team participation will be extended till
hot commissioning, or the moment where the plant is handover to the client to start the ramp-up process.
The
cost of pre-operational testing have been addressed as an allowance of 2% of the Direct Cost.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0
Page 3-15
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
3.9 Owner
Costs
Owner’s
costs were provided by the client. Please see the summary in the Table 3-8.
The
cost of owner’s costs was integrated in the estimate, Owner’s cost contingency was considered imbedded in each cost area.
Table
3-8: Owner’s Costs summary
WBS
MUSD
%
of OC
9110
Owner’s
Project Management
10.20
3.2%
9120
Owner’s
Travel & Expenses
2.50
0.8%
9150
Owner’s
IT/IS Services
1.00
0.3%
9160
Owner’s
3rd Party Consultants
5.00
1.6%
9210
Land
Acquisition
3.75
1.2%
9230
Easement
2.70
0.9%
9300
Legal
& Permitting
11.55
3.7%
9410
Insurance
2.45
0.8%
9710
Project
Support Costs
9.00
2.9%
9900
Exploration
and Mining and Offsite Infrastructure
278.87
84.7%
Total
Owner’s costs
327.02
100%
3.10 Contingency
Contingency
included in the cost estimate is an allowance for normal and expected items of work which must be performed within the defined scope
of work and project execution plan as covered by the cost estimate, but which could not be explicitly foreseen or described at the time
the estimate was completed.
The
contingency amount is an integral part of the cost estimate, and it should be assumed that contingency will be spent in completing the
project. Contingency does not cover significant scope changes, price escalation, currency fluctuations. Contingency does not include
allowances for project “event” risks such as labour unrest, blockades, adverse market conditions, force majeure, or any of
the items that are specifically excluded from the cost estimate.
Typical
uncertainties applicable to contingency:
● Insufficient
information due to incomplete engineering and/or lack of vendor or conditions information
● Equipment
or material costs obtained by ratio or update from historical costs or previous estimates.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0
Page 3-16
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
Contingency
allowances have been included as 40% of the sum of the estimated Direct and Indirect costs.
Contingency
= 30% x (Direct Costs + Indirect Costs)
3.11 OoM
estimate for 2.6 MTPA capacity plant
An
Order of Magnitude (OOM) estimate was developed for a different plant capacity using, as a reference the estimate presented above for
a plant capacity of 1.3 MTPA.
The
revised estimate was prepared by identifying and adjusting the areas affected by the change in capacity requirements. Specific areas
were determined to experience cost increases as a result of the new requirements, while other areas remained unchanged.
In
the table below a summary of the estimate is presented showing the factors used:
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0
Page 3-17
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 3 - Capital Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
Table
3-9: Order of Magnitude Estimate for Expansion
Area
1.3
MTPA
capacity
(MUSD)
Capacity
factor
2.6
MTPA
capacity
(MUSD)
Site
Development
49.56
1.60
79.29
Site
Power Distribution
39.32
2.00
78.64
Fuel,
Steam, Air and Cooling Water Systems
25.18
1.60
40.28
Water
and Sewage Systems
43.33
1.60
69.33
Laboratory
5.00
1.60
8.00
Non-Process
Buildings
18.84
1.20
22.61
Physical
Separation
66.31
1.60
106.10
Physical
Separation building
64.65
1.50
96.97
Pre-Treatment
149.80
1.60
239.68
Pre-Treatment
building
13.83
1.50
20.75
Carbo-Chlorination
237.46
1.60
379.93
Critical
Mineral Recovery
247.62
1.60
396.19
Rare
Earth Recovery
77.86
1.60
124.58
Residue
Management
151.06
1.60
241.69
Residue
Management building
49.05
1.50
73.57
Chlorine
Recovery
20.16
1.60
32.25
Product
Handling & Packaging
8.00
2.00
16.00
Reagents
Storage and Supply
6.22
1.60
9.96
Liquid
Reagents
4.17
1.60
6.68
Solid
Reagents
2.28
1.60
3.65
Gas
Reagents
13.80
1.60
22.07
Reagents
Unloading Station
3.00
1.60
4.80
Direct
Cost
1,296.49
2,073.03
Indirect
Cost
440.45
704.26
Contingency
521.08
833.19
Owner’s
Cost
327.02
389.67
Total
Cost
2,585.05
4,000.15
Same
base date, currency and exclusions stated in the section 3 are applicable to the estimate.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE03, Rev. 0
Page 3-18
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
Ramaco
Resources
Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial
Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate
2026-07-28
0
Issued
for Use
G.
Law
J.
Gorst
F.
Delgado
Date
Rev.
Status
Prepared
By
Checked
By
Approved
By
Approved
By
Client
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
Table
of Contents
4.
Operating Cost
4-1
4.1
OPEX Estimate Summary
4-1
4.1.1
Maintenance Expense
4-2
4.1.2
Reagents Expense
4-2
4.1.3
Energy / Utilities Expense
4-3
4.1.4
Labour Expense
4-5
4.2
OPEX Basis of Estimate
4-7
4.2.1
Reagents
4-7
4.2.2
Consumables
4-8
4.2.3
Energy / Utilities
4-9
4.2.4
Plant Labour
4-10
4.2.5
Maintenance
4-13
4.2.6
General & Administration (G&A)
4-13
4.2.7
Transportation & Logistics
4-13
4.2.8
Allowances & Fees
4-13
4.2.9
Contingency
4-13
4.3
OPEX Case Study – Increased Throughput
4-14
List
of Figures
Figure
4-1: Total OPEX Category Breakdown.
4-2
Figure
4-2: Reagent Annual Cost Breakdown.
4-3
Figure
4-3: Energy / Utilities Annual Cost Breakdown.
4-4
Figure
4-4: Electricity Cost Breakdown per WBS.
4-4
Figure
4-5: Plant Organization Chart.
4-12
List
of Tables
Table 4-1: OPEX
Summary.
4-1
Table 4-2: Plant Labour Count
and Total Compensation.
4-6
Table 4-3: Reagent Unit Cost
and Consumption.
4-8
Table 4-4: Consumable Unit
Cost and Consumption.
4-9
Table 4-5: Utilities Unit
Cost and Consumption.
4-10
Table 4-6: OPEX Comparison
for 2.6M vs. 1.3M tpa ROM.
4-14
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0
Page 4-i
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
4. Operating
Cost
Total
operating cost is summarized in the following section. This estimate has been escalated based on increased HPA production (i.e., from
1,800 to 11,848 mt/y HPA), as per the request of Ramaco (email: “RE: HPA production”, received July 8th, 2026).
For additional information regarding unit price, unit quantity, factors, and salaries, refer to Section 4.2.
4.1 OPEX
Estimate Summary
The
Operating Cost Estimate (OPEX) for the plant is 150.7 M USD. A breakdown of the expenses are shown in Table 4-1 and Figure 4-1 below,
where CMO is the Critical Mineral Oxides equivalent (i.e., rare earth oxides, Sc2O3, GeO2, Ga2O3)
and “Other” includes transportation logistics, allowances, and fees. Contingency and General & Administration (G&A)
have been excluded from the estimate, as per Ramaco’s request.
Table
4-1: OPEX Summary.
Cost
Component
Annual
Operating Cost
(M USD)
Unit
Cost
(USD / mt ROM)
Percentage
of
Total OPEX
Reagents
72.2
55.6
48%
Utilities
23.8
18.3
16%
Consumables
3.2
2.4
2%
Labour
22.0
16.9
15%
Maintenance
17.9
13.8
12%
G&A
-
-
-
Other
11.7
9.1
8%
Total
(excl. contingency)
150.7
116.1
100%
Contingency1
-
-
-
Total
(incl. contingency)
150.7
116.1
100%
1 Per
Ramaco’s request, contingency was excluded from this estimate. Hatch advises on the
inclusion of contingency to account for inherent uncertainties at this level of estimate
maturity.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0
Page 4-1
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
Figure
4-1: Total OPEX Category Breakdown.
Major
categories impacting the OPEX are the Maintenance, Reagents, Utilities, and Labour. Additional information regarding each of these categories
is discussed in the sections below.
4.1.1 Maintenance
Expense
Maintenance
expenses account for the costs of maintenance materials and the annual contract works, with the former making up the majority of the
cost (i.e., 94%). The 4% maintenance materials factor was based on typical pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical plants and was applied
to the direct equipment and material costs from the capital cost estimate (CAPEX, H376597-0000-622-624-0001). Maintenance labour is accounted
for in the general labour cost. As the Class 5 CAPEX estimates the equipment cost to be 421 M USD, the maintenance materials cost was
estimated to be approximately 16.9 M USD per annum. See Section 4.2.5 for additional information.
4.1.2 Reagents
Expense
Total
annual reagent cost is 72.2 M USD. A breakdown of cost per reagent is presented in Figure 4-2 below. The “Other” category
includes sodium hydroxide pellets, some organics (kerosene, TBP, PC-88A, n-dodecane), iron powder, soda ash, and flotation frother.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0
Page 4-2
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
Figure
4-2: Reagent Annual Cost Breakdown.
Main
contributors to the reagent expense are chlorine gas and sodium hydroxide.
Ramaco
is currently exploring alternative chlorine gas sourcing – i.e., chlorine recovery from PVC waste products – that could potentially
decrease the procurement cost of chlorine gas. The alternative avenue is assumed to decrease the procurement cost to 100 USD per
metric tonne of gas resulting in an annual savings of ~18 M USD. Refer to Section 6 – Project Risks & Opportunities for more
information.
Primary
sodium hydroxide consumption is in the off-gas treatment for the neutralization of SOx species and in waste neutralization. The sodium
hydroxide consumption for waste neutralization could be decreased by recycling HCl-rich waste solutions (such as the Ge decanter waste)
as reagent within the plant. This would save on hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide costs. However, test work is required to ensure
these changes would not contaminate products such as MREC and Sc2O3.
4.1.3 Energy
/ Utilities Expense
Energy
accounts for 16% of the total OPEX. A breakdown of total energy cost per type is shown in Figure 4-3 below. Costs associated with water
and coal consumption were excluded from the diagram as they were assumed to not have any fees, as per RFI 0009 (H376597-0000-210-465-0009).
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0
Page 4-3
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
Figure
4-3: Energy / Utilities Annual Cost Breakdown.
As
shown in the above figure, electricity accounts for 97% of the energy cost. A further breakdown of electricity cost per Work Breakdown
Structure (WBS) is shown below in Figure 4-4, where “Allowance” is a fixed 15% factor allocated for HVAC and conveyance needs.
The “Other Areas” includes the following areas and account for minor electrical demand from pumps, agitators, small dryers,
etc.:
●
Area 3200 – Pre-Treatment
●
Area 4500 – Residue Management
●
Area 4100 – Carbo-Chlorination
●
Area 5100 – Liquid Reagents
●
Area 4200 – Critical Mineral Recovery
●
Area 5200 – Solid Reagents
Figure
4-4: Electricity Cost Breakdown per WBS.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0
Page 4-4
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
Area
5300 accounts for the majority of electrical demand due to the air separation plant, which based on a preliminary vendor quotation would
require 11.7 MW to operate.
4.1.4 Labour
Expense
Labour
cost to staff the plant during steady-state operation is estimated to be 22 M USD per annum. A breakdown of staff positions, salaries
and annual cost are outlined in Table 4-2, where the position salary accounts for total compensation (inclusive of benefits, pensions,
etc.). See Section 4.2.4 for additional information.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0
Page 4-5
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
Table
4-2: Plant Labour Count and Total Compensation.
Staff
Position
No.
of Shift Workers
(# / shift)
No.
of Day Workers
Total
Employees
Position
Salary
(USD / y)
Annual
Cost
(USD / y)
Administration
Operations
Manager
-
1
1
222,000
222,000
Superintendent1
-
1
1
161,000
161,000
Executive
Assistant / Administrative Clerk
-
3
3
63,600
190,800
HR
Specialist
-
-
-
99,800
-
Accountant
-
-
-
116,700
-
Security
2
-
10
55,200
552,000
HSE
/ Training Coordinators
-
2
2
94,100
188,200
Nurse
-
1
1
87,300
87,300
Production
Superintendent
-
1
1
161,000
161,000
General
Foreman2
-
6
6
127,800
766,800
Shift
Foreman2
6
-
30
120,400
3,612,000
Plant
Operators2
15
-
75
98,767
7,407,500
Controls
Control
Room Supervisor
-
1
1
127,800
127,800
Control
Room Operators
4
-
20
117,700
2,354,000
Engineers
Chief
Process Engineer
-
1
1
175,500
175,500
Process
Control Engineer
-
2
2
164,600
329,200
Process
Engineer2
-
5
5
159,100
795,500
Laboratory
Chief
Assayer
-
1
1
127,200
127,200
Assayer
2
-
10
75,600
756,000
Maintenance
Superintendent
-
1
1
161,000
161,000
Foreman
1
-
5
120,400
602,000
Planner
-
1
1
120,400
120,400
Clerk
-
1
1
63,600
63,600
Millwrights
/ Tradesman
2
-
10
91,600
916,000
Welder
/ Fabricator
-
6
6
115,100
690,600
Machinist
-
2
2
98,100
196,200
Electrician
1
-
5
103,300
516,500
Instrument
Technician
1
-
5
126,800
634,000
Serviceman
/ Tool Crib Attendant
-
1
1
58,200
58,200
1 Positions
that may be shared with the Brook Mine facilities.
2 These
positions are distributed in different process areas. The number presented is the sum required
for the overall plant.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0
Page 4-6
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
4.2 OPEX
Basis of Estimate
The
OPEX is based on a typical steady-state operating year after ramp-up. The following parameters were used to estimate the costs associated
with plant operation:
● The
currency is based on US dollars with a base rate of Q1 2026.
● The
intended accuracy is consistent with a conceptual study level definition.
● All
costs are exclusive of taxes or duties.
● No
forward escalation was included.
● Feed
and product transport costs are excluded.
● No
consideration is given to long term variation or averages for reagent / utility pricing or
labour costs.
● No
allowance for overhead costs is considered in this estimate.
● At
Ramaco’s request, contingency has been excluded from this OPEX, and no allowance for
unknown risks is included. As a result, the estimate carries an increased level of cost uncertainty
and associated risk.
The
estimate covers all costs expected during standard operation including:
●
Reagents & Consumables
●
General & Administration (G&A)
●
Energy / Utilities
●
Transportation & Logistics
●
Plant Labour
●
Allowances & Fees
●
Maintenance
The
calculation methodology applied for each section of the OPEX is summarized below. Detailed estimate information, including major inputs,
can be found in the OPEX estimate (H376597-0000-622-624-0001).
4.2.1 Reagents
Reagent
unit rates were either provided by Ramaco or Hatch’s internal database based on prior vendor quotations. Consumption rates were
calculated based on the Mass & Energy Balance (MEB) Stream Table (H376597-0000-210-216-0002, Rev. G). An allowance (5 vol.%)
was included for annual replacement of organic solutions to account for expected degradation during operation. A breakdown of the reagent
unit costs and consumptions is provided in Table 4-3 below.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0
Page 4-7
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
Table
4-3: Reagent Unit Cost and Consumption.
Reagent
Unit
Cost
Unit
Consumption
Unit
Cost Source
Hydrochloric
Acid (35 wt.%)
360
USD
/ mt
1.9
mt
/ h
Hatch
in-house budgetary quote.
Sodium
Hydroxide (50 wt.%)
424
USD
/ mt
8.9
mt
/ h
"
Sodium
Hydroxide (Pellets)
855
USD
/ mt
3.4
kg
/ h
"
Kerosene
2,055
USD
/ mt
5.91
kg
/ h
"
TBP
8,095
USD
/ mt
0.51
kg
/ h
"
PC-88A
9,256
USD
/ mt
1.31
kg
/ h
"
n-Dodecane
600
USD
/ mt
13.91
kg
/ h
Client
response to RFI 0009. Received May 27, 2026.
Hexane
1,066
USD
/ mt
562.3
kg
/ h
Hatch
in-house budgetary quote.
Iron
Powder
1,680
USD
/ mt
16.5
kg
/ h
"
Soda
Ash
530
USD
/ mt
67.7
kg
/ h
"
Flotation
Collector
5,720
USD
/ mt
31.8
kg
/ h
"
Flotation
Frother
2,650
USD
/ mt
3.2
kg
/ h
"
Chlorine
Gas
300
USD
/ mt
11.1
mt
/ h
Client
email: “PVC and E-waste opportunity statements”. Received May 29, 2026.
1 These
unit consumptions account for the annual replacement allowance factored on an hourly basis.
4.2.2 Consumables
General
consumables considered in the OPEX include product packaging materials (bulk bags, drums, etc.), filter cloths, polish filter socks,
and pallets. Non-quantified consumables are accounted for as part of a General Consumables allowance (see Section 4.2.8).
The
unit cost of product packaging materials were either sourced from vendors or provided by Ramaco. Consumption rates for product packaging
were based on the maximum allowable volume or weight for a given item. A cost allowance per filtration area was allocated to the filter
cloths and polish filter socks based on in-house data. Filter cloth demand was based on preliminary equipment sizing of filter presses
and candle filters. A breakdown of consumable unit cost and consumption is shown below.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0
Page 4-8
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
Table
4-4: Consumable Unit Cost and Consumption.
Consumable
Unit
Cost
Unit
Consumption
Unit
Cost Source
Fiber
Drums
68
USD
/ drum
13,721
drums
/ y
Uline
Fiber Drums, 55 gallons.
Plastic
Bottles
2.90
USD
/ bottle
2,118
bottles
/ y
Uline
EZ-Pour F-Style Jugs
Bulk
Bags
9.99
USD
/ bag
15,012
bags
/ y
Palmetto
Industries Bulk Bags (FIBC) - Duffle Top, Flat Bottom, 35” x 35” x 40” .
Pallets
55
USD
/ pallet
18,442
pallets
/ y
Uline
New Wood Pallets, Heat-Treated Export. 48” x 48".
Filter
Cloth1
75
USD
/ m2
7,851
m2
/ y
Allowance
1 This
cost includes material and installation.
Hatch
assumed that fiber drums would be used to package GeO2, MREC, and Sc2O3, while plastic bottles would
be used for liquid gallium metal and bulk bags would be used for Al2O3 and SiO2. Pallets are assumed
to be used for the transportation of fiber drums and bulk bags, with each pallet carrying either 4 drums or 1 bulk bag.
4.2.3 Energy
/ Utilities
This
section considers costs associated with energy consumption from local grids, natural gas, coal, and diesel as well as any associated
costs with water consumption.
Energy
consumption was calculated based on preliminary sizing of major equipment. Unit costs were either provided by Ramaco or based on recent
U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) data. A miscellaneous power consumption factor (15%) on the total power requirement has
been included to account for HVAC and conveyance demand. An diesel allowance of 200 L / day was allocated for all non-electric vehicles
(i.e., forklifts, utility vehicles, etc.).
Water
consumption was calculated based on the MEB Stream Table and Staffing Plan. A potable water allowance (300 L / person / day) has been
included based on prior Hatch experience. As per the client response to RFI 0009 (H376597-0000-210-465-0009), no consumption cost is
associated with water as it is being pumped from a local well.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0
Page 4-9
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
Table
4-5: Utilities Unit Cost and Consumption.
Utilities
Unit
Cost
Unit
Consumption
Unit
Cost Source
Water
Raw
Water
-
USD
/ m3
387
m3
/ h
Client
response to RFI 0009.
Potable
Water
-
USD
/ m3
300
L
/ person / day
"
DI
Water
-
USD
/ m3
31
m3
/ h
"
Electricity
Consumption
94.0
USD
/ MW
30.4
MW
Client
email: “Operating Cost Estimate – Client Comments”. Received July 9, 2026.
Connection
-
USD
/ MW
-
-
Client
response to RFI 0009.
Other
Natural
Gas
1.30
USD
/ MW
66.4
MW
U.S.
Energy Information Administration. Converted from cubic feet.
Diesel
0.94
USD
/ L
200
L
/ day
"
Coal
-
USD
/ mt
29.3
mt
/ h
Client
response to RFI 0009.
4.2.4 Plant
Labour
The
staffing plan and labour rates from the previous conceptual study were used as basis for this phase.
Staffing
was divided into three main groups: production, maintenance, and administration. Production was further broken down into the following
six subgroups, based on the WBS:
● Area
2300, 2400, 4700, 5000 – Reagents, Utilities & Product Storage
● Area
3100 – Physical Separation
● Area
3200 – ROM Drying & Roasting, Coal Coking
● Area
4100, 4220, 4240, 4600 – Carbo-Chlorination & Pyrolysis
● Area
4210, 4230 – Gallium & Germanium Recovery
● Area
4300 – Water Leach, REE & Scandium Recovery.
Each
production area was assigned a general manager (i.e., general foreman), a shift foreman, and a series of operators. Number of operators
per area was based on process complexity and expected operator workload. With the exception of the Reagents, Utilities & Product
Storage area, a process engineer was also assigned to each area.
Within
the administrative group, some positions have been highlighted as optional for this facility. The HR specialist and accountant are assumed
to be shared with the existing Brook Mine facility, as such their salaries were excluded from this estimate. The nurse is assumed to
solely be a day position due to the plant’s proximity to the local hospital. The administration superintendent is currently assumed
to be a day position but there is the potential for the role to be shared with the other Brook Mine facility and removed from this estimate.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0
Page 4-10
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
Shifts
were defined as 12-hour shifts with an expected roster of two day shifts and two night shifts followed by four days off. Five workers
would be required to cover one shift work position, accounting for leave and illness.
The
labour plant is outlined in Figure 4-5 below, where the administrative superintendent has been highlighted as an optional position that
could be shared with the Brook Mine staff. The HR specialist and accountant have excluded based on assumptions listed above.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0
Page 4-11
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
Figure
4-5: Plant Organization Chart.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0
Page 4-12
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
4.2.5 Maintenance
An
allocation for maintenance material expenses was included in the OPEX. Maintenance materials costs were factored based on the CAPEX mechanical
and material cost. A factor of 4% was used for the plant based on typical plants (pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical) and due to
the high temperatures, and chlorine corrosion risks. This factor does not include maintenance labour, which is captured in the labour
cost.
An
annual contract work allowance was added in case of additional maintenance expenses. An allowance of 1 million USD per year was included.
4.2.6 General
& Administration (G&A)
Administrative
expenses costs include, and are not limited to, software licenses, business travel, training, etc. As per Ramaco’s request, G&A
has been excluded from the OPEX as the expenses will be account for by the Owner.
4.2.7 Transportation
& Logistics
A
residue handling & off-site transportation fee of 1 USD / mt was included for the disposal of rejected quartz, ZLD waste, Chlorine
Recovery (Area 4600) waste and crud waste outside of the plant site. This includes transportation of the waste to a dry stacking area.
Costs
for final product outbound logistics were excluded in this study.
4.2.8 Allowances
& Fees
General
consumables allowance was factored based on the total OPEX excluding contingency. This cost accounts for non-quantified reagents (ex.
cooling tower reagents) and consumables (ex. ceramic filters). A factor of 0.5% was used for the plant.
Equipment
facility fees have been included for the air separation plant based on the preliminary vendor quotation from Messer as part of their
Build, Own & Operate program.
4.2.9 Contingency
At
Ramaco’s request, contingency has been excluded from this OPEX, and no allowance for unknown risks is included. As a result, the
estimate carries an increased level of cost uncertainty and associated risks.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0
Page 4-13
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 4 - Operating Cost Estimate - July 28, 2026
4.3 OPEX
Case Study – Increased Throughput
The
following table summarizes an order-of-magnitude OPEX based on an increased ROM throughput (i.e., from 1.3 to 2.6 million dry tonnes
per annum), in comparison with the original throughput of 1.3Mtpa ROM.
Table
4-6: OPEX Comparison for 2.6M vs. 1.3M tpa ROM.
Cost
Component
2.6
Mtpa ROM
1.3
Mtpa ROM
Annual
Operating Cost
Unit
Cost
Annual
Operating Cost
Unit
Cost
(M
USD)
(USD
/ mt ROM)
(M
USD)
(USD
/ mt ROM)
Reagents
144.3
55.5
72.2
55.6
Utilities
47.5
18.3
23.8
18.3
Consumables
6.3
2.4
3.2
2.4
Labour
22
8.5
22
16.9
Maintenance
29.9
11.5
17.9
13.8
G&A
-
-
-
-
Other
23.4
9.0
11.7
9.1
Total
(excl. contingency)
273.4
105.2
150.7
116.1
Contingency1
-
-
-
-
Total
(incl. contingency)
273.4
105.2
150.7
116.1
1 Per
Ramaco’s request, contingency was excluded from this estimate. Hatch advises on the
inclusion of contingency to account for inherent uncertainties at this level of estimate
maturity.
The
cost components were costed as per the Basis of Estimate and scaled accordingly based on the increased ROM throughput. The following
exceptions were made for the order-of-magnitude estimate:
● The
staffing plan was assumed to be unchanged.
● Daily
allowances (ex. Diesel, potable water) were assumed unchanged.
● Maintenance
material allowance was based on the direct mechanical equipment & material cost, escalated
using the 6/10th rule.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE04, Rev. 0
Page 4-14
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026
Ramaco
Resources
Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial
Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution
Strategy and Schedule
2026-07-28
0
Issued
for Use
F.
Delgado
C.
D’Cunha
J.
Gorst
Date
Rev.
Status
Prepared
By
Checked
By
Approved
By
Approved
By
Client
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026
Table
of Contents
5.
Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule
5-1
5.1
Engineering Development
5-1
5.1.1
Scoping Study
5-1
5.1.2
Pre-Feasibility Study
5-1
5.1.3
Feasibility Study (FS)
5-2
5.1.4
Basic Engineering/FEED
5-3
5.2
Conceptual Plot Plan
5-4
5.2.1
Site Constraints
5-4
5.2.2
Site Laydown and/or Expansion
5-5
5.2.3
1110 – Site Access Roads
5-6
5.2.4
1210 – Electrical Power Supply
5-7
5.2.5
1220 – Raw Water Supply
5-7
5.2.6
2120 – Roads and Stormwater Management
5-7
5.2.7
2130 – Stormwater Ponds
5-7
5.2.8
2210 – Main Substation
5-8
5.2.9
2710 – Gatehouse Building
5-9
5.2.10
2720 – Administration Building
5-9
5.2.11
2750 – Maintenance Building
5-10
5.2.12
2750 – Warehouse – Parts and Products
5-10
5.2.13
3120 – Grade Benches for Crushing Circuit
5-11
5.3
Procurement Strategy
5-12
5.4
Permitting
5-14
5.5
Execution Schedule
5-14
List of Figures
Figure 5-1:
Plot Boundaries.
5-5
Figure 5-2:
Laydown / Expansion Areas.
5-5
Figure 5-3:
General Plant Access Road.
5-6
Figure 5-4:
Haul Truck Access Point.
5-6
Figure 5-5:
Tie-in To Electrical Grid.
5-7
Figure 5-6:
Pond Arrangements.
5-8
Figure 5-7:
Electrical Switchyard.
5-8
Figure 5-8:
Gatehouse.
5-9
Figure 5-9:
Administration Building.
5-10
Figure 5-10:
Maintenance Building.
5-10
Figure 5-11:
Product Storage Building.
5-11
Figure 5-12:
Grade Benches for Crushing Circuit.
5-12
Figure 5-13:
ROM / Coal Stockpiles and Reclaim.
5-12
List of Tables
Table 5-1:
Major Equipment Supply Contracts.
5-13
Table 5-2:
Major Construction Contracts.
5-13
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0
Page 5-i
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026
5. Preliminary
Execution Strategy and Schedule
A
high-level strategy and schedule for executing the Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project has been developed, including:
● Identifying
phases of engineering development.
● Identifying
critical equipment supply packages.
● Presenting
a level 1 schedule for executing the project and discussing opportunities and risks of the
different flowsheet options.
5.1 Engineering
Development
The
following subsections discuss the assumed program for engineering development. A staged project delivery model is recommended as indicated
in the following subsections. The novel nature of the process necessitates a rigorous engineering development program.
5.1.1 Initial
Assessment Study
The
initial Assessment Study study was completed by a small team, primarily consisting of process engineers. The objective of the scoping
phase was to advance understanding of the process options in preparation for the Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS, Option Selection) phase.
It is expected the pre-feasibility study will be completed in parallel to metallurgical test work.
Initial
Assessment study tasks include:
● Developing
the process design criteria (PDC) including incorporating available test data.
● Developing
block flow diagrams (BFD) and preliminary mass-energy balances (MEB).
● Developing
a conceptual level plot plan for each option.
● Identify
major utility requirements including power supply, water supply, etc.
● Develop
capital estimates according to AACE Class 5 guidelines and operating cost estimates.
5.1.2 Pre-Feasibility
Study
The
objective of the Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS) is to advance the flowsheet options based on test work data and then to select the preferred
option to use as the basis of the Feasibility Study (FS) phase. The PFS team will consist mostly of process engineers supported by some
discipline engineers and cost estimators.
PFS
tasks include:
● For
each option:
♦ Advancing
process deliverables such as the PDC and MEB, and developing process flow diagrams (PFDs).
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0
Page 5-1
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026
♦ Advancing
the plot plan.
♦ Obtaining
budget quotes for the supply of major equipment.
♦ Generating
capital cost estimates according to AACE Class 4 (-/+30%) guidelines and operating cost estimates.
♦ Assessing
environmental considerations.
♦ Developing
a level 2 project execution schedule.
● Completion
of a preliminary geotechnical investigation. As required, the sites will be assessed and
the information is to be incorporated in engineering development.
● Selection
of a preferred process option.
● Developing
a workplan for the FS phase of the project.
The
PFS phase is expected to take 9–11 months to complete.
5.1.3 Feasibility
Study (FS)
The
main objective of the FS is to develop, for the selected process option, the project definition sufficiently to support an economic decision.
The FS team will include process engineers, discipline engineers, planners, and estimators.
Tasks
required to meet this objective include:
● Advancing
the process deliverables including the PDC, PFDs and MEB. Available test data to be incorporated
when possible.
● Completing
applicable (secondary) trade-off studies to establish the plant configuration and to minimize
the project’s carbon footprint.
● Completing
a feasibility level geotechnical investigation to support the feasibility study designs.
● Developing
Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams.
● Developing
a 3D model of the facility and associated site plans.
● Development
of Functional Descriptions including Control and Operating Philosophy.
● Supporting
the permitting effort including providing emissions inventory data.
● Progressing
discipline engineering to FS level including discipline design criteria, mechanical equipment
list, high-level piping & instrument diagrams (P&IDs), single line diagrams (SLDs),
process control architectural diagrams, and IO lists.
● Completing
a preliminary Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP).
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0
Page 5-2
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026
● Preparing
detailed technical specifications for major equipment supply packages and issuing to vendors
for multiple budgetary proposals to support the CAPEX and project execution schedule.
● Preparing
a project execution strategy and level 3 schedule.
● Developing
a capital cost estimate as per AACE Class 3 guidelines with an intended accuracy of +/- 15%.
High-level material take-offs (MTOs) will be developed for all disciplines (for example,
concrete MTOs will be developed based on building footprints with consideration for equipment
loads and geotechnical conditions, structural steel MTOs will be generated based on building
volumes and in-house data).
● Developing
an operating cost estimate with an intended accuracy of +/- 15%.
● Completing
a project risk review workshop.
● Developing
the FS final report.
The
FS will be used by Ramaco in support of its internal project gate review program to secure approval and funding for the project.
5.1.4 Basic
Engineering/FEED
The
objective of the Basic Engineering/FEED phase will be to prepare the project to proceed with full execution. Home office engineering
and procurement teams would ramp-up in preparation for EPCM.
Assumed
Basic Engineering/FEED tasks include the following:
● Developing
commercial documents to support issuing requests for proposals to vendors and contractors.
● Issuing
RFPs for critical equipment supply packages, obtaining firm price bids and completing bid
clarifications, evaluations, and recommendations in preparation for award.
● Completing
a geotechnical investigation to support detailed engineering.
● Developing
and firm price bid packages for the supply of other major equipment, obtaining multiple bids,
complete clarifications, bid evaluations and recommendations for award.
● Updating
the 3D model to incorporate available vendor data and input from the preliminary HAZOP.
● Developing
Site Preparations and Early Work contract documents and issuing to contractors to obtain
firm price bids. Complete bid clarifications and evaluations in preparation to award.
● Developing
a detailed project execution plan and schedule.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0
Page 5-3
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026
● Developing
the Project Procedures Manual (PPM).
● Re-estimating
the project CAPEX.
● Generating
the “project control documents” (CAPEX and schedule).
5.2 Conceptual
Plot Plan
Ramaco
provided Hatch with a suggested location for the commercial plant site. This location took into consideration the local topography, existing
road layout, property boundary line as well as permit area. Hatch has developed the layout with the assumption that grading will be carried
out by Ramaco to provide a level site for the main plant, with appropriate benches to accommodate the crushing circuit.
See
drawings H376597-0000-203-290-0001 & 0002 for Site Plan and Plot Plan. Some key aspects of the layout are discussed on the following
pages.
5.2.1 Site
Constraints
The
site area has 4 general constraints:
A. West
Side – Existing county roads and private road and Ramaco’s property line
B. North
Side – Ramaco property line / Permit area
C. East
side – Existing creek
D. South
Side – Existing Interstate Highway
Hatch
was advised to locate the plant at least 500 ft from the property and road constraints. Hatch placed the fenceline ~500 ft from the west
side roads. During the project model review, Ramaco advised that there is leased area and it prefers all plant entities, including parking
lots to reside on owned real property. This lot boundary was subsequently added to the layout, which highlights the fact that the proposed
parking locations straddle the boundary between owned and leased property. A layout modification to relocate the parking areas within
the owned property will be facilitated in the next project phase. Refer to. Refer to Figure 5-1.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0
Page 5-4
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026
Figure
5-1: Plot Boundaries.
5.2.2 Site
Laydown and/or Expansion
Areas
for plant operations laydown have been situated within the current layout. These areas may be utilized, in part, for expansion purposes.
Note, that it is always advisable to allow for permanent laydown areas to facilitate efficient plant operations. Refer to Figure 5-2
for areas marked for these purposes.
Figure
5-2: Laydown / Expansion Areas.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0
Page 5-5
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026
5.2.3 1110
– Site Access Roads
Access
for road vehicles has been provided along the existing Coal Bank Rd. One access road is south of the plant, while the other is across
from the existing Slater Creek Rd. Both of these access points are south of the existing private road, South Ash Creek Rd. See
Figure 5-3 below.
Figure
5-3: General Plant Access Road.
It
is common practice to separate haul truck traffic from road traffic for practicality and safety purposes. For the current layout, the
approach taken is to have a separate haul truck access point to a raised bench within the site, allowing for a rear dump station to the
primary crushing circuit for both ROM and Coal feeds. It is assumed that Ramaco will grade local roads to ensure access at this elevation
meets acceptable grade inclines for safe operation of the haul trucks. Refer to Figure 5-4.
Figure
5-4: Haul Truck Access Point.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0
Page 5-6
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026
5.2.4 1210
– Electrical Power Supply
It
is assumed that there will be an electrical tie-in from south of the existing interstate highway, running north to the south west corner
of the plant. See Figure 5-5.
Figure
5-5: Tie-in To Electrical Grid.
5.2.5 1220
– Raw Water Supply
It
is the assumption that raw water will be accessible to the site by means of locally drilled wells.
5.2.6 2120
– Roads and Stormwater Management
The
site roads have been laid out with 13 ft wide lanes, along with 4 ft wide shoulders. The road layout can accommodate 40 ft truck trailers
(60 ft minimum road radius for main plant roads). There is an allowance for 40 ft easements from a building/structure to the edge of
road shoulders, which allows for space for buried services, e.g. firewater lines, and/or drainage systems, e.g. stormwater ditches. An
allowance of 10ft clearances adjacent to the road shoulders has been included for these utility/drainage purposes (allowance to be verified
in the next phases of the project).
5.2.7 2130
– Stormwater Ponds
For
the current project phase, the layout has provision for three stormwater ponds for surface water runoff requirements across the site.
The ponds’ location take advantage of natural topographical runoff valleys. Refer to Figure 5-6.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0
Page 5-7
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026
Figure
5-6: Pond Arrangements.
5.2.8 2210
– Main Substation
The
electrical switchyard is located in the Southwest quadrant of the plot. It is separated from the plant by an interior fence, allowing
access from the west by the local utility corporation, and from the east by plant personnel. Refer to Figure 5-7.
Figure
5-7: Electrical Switchyard.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0
Page 5-8
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026
5.2.9 2710
– Gatehouse Building
A
gatehouse is located at the west entrance of the plant to validate deliveries and monitor incoming and outgoing trucks. Gatehouse personnel
can direct incoming vehicles to staging, the truck scale or through to the main plant area. This scale is dedicated to a lane that runs
adjacent to a bypass lane, as some trucks do not need to be weighed before entering the plant. For vehicles transporting materials and
feedstock into the facility, an accurate record must be made of their payload. As such, a truck scale has been included with a clear
view to the gatehouse. Refer to Figure 5-8. In addition, the gatehouse will serve as the first entry point for visitors and staff. Alternatively
the general staff could enter through to the administration building by means of a controlled turnstile through the perimeter fence.
Figure
5-8: Gatehouse.
5.2.10 2720
– Administration Building
The
administration building is the primary building which houses the largest contingent of operations personnel. It is located on the
west end of the plot, adjacent to both the employee parking area and the employee entrance gate and thus allows for swift evacuation
out of the plant area in the event of an emergency. The Administration Building consists of a single-story building on grade and would
be fully finished with heating and air conditioning systems. Floor plans have not yet been developed but the layout area assumes inclusion
of a control room, change rooms, laboratory, lunch room, medical room, meeting rooms, offices, security office, training room, and washrooms.
Refer to Figure 5-9.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0
Page 5-9
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026
Figure
5-9: Administration Building.
5.2.11 2750
– Maintenance Building
A
Maintenance Building is also included, adjacent to the administration building, for general maintenance to be performed on plant equipment,
as well as select mobile equipment such as forklifts and small trucks. The building has space allocation for parts storage, two washrooms
and an office. The building is on the west side of the truck yard, across from the warehouse, which allows for efficient retrieval of
additional spare parts from stores. There are 4 vehicle access doors to accommodate road vehicles, forklifts or bobcats, and a 20 ft
flatbed truck for delivery of larger equipment such as agitator assemblies. An overhead crane will be installed to allow for equipment
to be loaded off and onto a truck. Refer to Figure 5-10.
Figure
5-10: Maintenance Building.
5.2.12 2750
– Warehouse – Parts and Products
A
warehouse is included in the west half of the plant. This building would house end products, general supplies and general equipment spare
parts on steel racking allowing for 3 pallets high of storage (to allow a general forklift to handle warehouse operations). Should the
building be required to increase the storage capacity, the plant layout can be modified in the next project phase to extend the footprint
to suit. An option would be to increase the building height to accommodate taller racking, however, that would necessitate using reach
trucks to lift loads to higher levels.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0
Page 5-10
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026
The
building has been designed with two grade level loading bays (via ramp) to accommodate hard side containers with rear door loading. In
addition, there is a drive-in bay to permit loading/unloading of a 20 ft flatbed trailer by means of an overhead crane. The 20 ft flatbed
truck can then distribute materials throughout the site. A washroom has been included within the layout for the building. Refer to Figure
5-11.
Figure
5-11: Product Storage Building.
5.2.13 3120
– Grade Benches for Crushing Circuit
The
inclusion of a crushing circuit requires a difference in elevations to permit a gravity fed crusher feed system. This arrangement often
utilizes the local topography to establish an elevated bench for the haul trucks to dump loads into a feed bin/hopper.
Downstream
of this primary stage crushing, are either secondary crushers or transfer stations (if required). The crushed material is then conveyed
to a crushed stockpile (within an enclosed building for environmental purposes). From there, a reclaim system is utilized to provide
a constant feed to the process. Two options were considered for the reclaim system:
(1)
Front end loader transfer from stockpile to feed hopper along conveyor, or
(2)
Subterrain reclaim feeder along with tunnel.
For
the purposes of this project phase, Ramaco suggested that we consider a below ground feeder arrangement which requires a tunnel below
the stockpiles. In order to establish a shallow angle on the transfer conveyor, an elevated bench was considered to minimize the overall
circuit footprint, i.e. having the stockpile buildings on the same grade elevation as the main plant would require a greater distance
between the receiving process equipment and the stockpiles due to the maximum angle of the conveyor arrangement. Refer to Figures Figure
5-12 and Figure 5-13.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0
Page 5-11
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026
Figure
5-12: Grade Benches for Crushing Circuit.
Figure
5-13: ROM / Coal Stockpiles and Reclaim.
5.3 Procurement
Strategy
An
Engineering, Procurement and Construction Management (EPCM) execution strategy is assumed for the project.
Major
process equipment supply packages, and assumed vendor post-award design and fabrication durations, are listed in Table 5-1. Durations
are assumed based on experience from previous projects. Note that equipment supply durations may vary considerably due to recent supply
chain disruptions.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0
Page 5-12
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026
Table
5-1: Major Equipment Supply Contracts.
Package
Title
Lead
Time (in weeks)
Large
Transformers
110
Fluid
Bed Calciners
77
Solvent
Extraction
69
Filter
Presses
52
Evaporators
and Crystallizers
52
Baghouses
48
Scrubbers
40
Cooling
Towers
40
A
list of assumed major construction contracts are highlighted in Table 5-2. At this stage of project development, it is assumed that the
construction contracting strategy will not change significantly between process flowsheet options, with only the scope and size of the
major contracts changing.
Table
5-2: Major Construction Contracts.
Package
No.
Package
Title
Remarks
Type
Category
Sequence
EPC
CONTRACTS - Design, Supply & Install
T
A
001
Administration
Building, Laboratory, Gate House. Includes lighting, HVAC, finishes, utilities, and furniture.
It
is assumed that these buildings are physically separated from other structures.
Fixed
Price. Excludes foundations
T
A
002
Process
Buildings.
Conceptual
layout to be developed during FS including equipment loading information.
Fixed
Price. Excludes foundations
T
A
003
Warehouses
and Maintenance Shop including HVAC, lighting, utility distribution and overhead crane (in maintenance shop).
Fixed
Price. Excludes foundations
CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACTS
C
A
001
Site
Development, Grading, Plant Roads, Drainage, and buried services.
Unit
Rate
C
C
001
Site
Wide Foundations/Concrete - supply and installation
Unit
Rate
C
D
001
Final
Grading, Site Finishes and Paving
Unit
Rate
C
M
001
Structural,
Mechanical, Piping, Electrical and Instrumentation (SMPEI). Includes the installation of “free issued” equipment.
Lump
Sum
C
E
001
High
voltage and medium voltage equipment installation including Main Substation, distribution, and E-Houses.
Lump
Sum
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0
Page 5-13
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026
5.4 Permitting
The
objective of this section is to identify and discuss the major permits and regulatory approvals that may be required for the construction
and operation of the proposed facility based on the current understanding of the project. As the project advances and the design, footprint,
and execution strategy become better defined, additional permitting requirements may be identified, and the permitting strategy may be
refined accordingly.
Depending
on the final project scope, funding structure, federal involvement, and regulatory jurisdiction, a review under the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) may be required. Should NEPA applicability be triggered, the appropriate federal agency could undertake an environmental
review to evaluate potential impacts associated with the proposed facility. The extent of such a review would depend on the nature of
the federal action involved and the potential environmental effects identified during project development. NEPA reviews can be comprehensive
and, where required, may represent a significant component of the overall permitting schedule. At this stage, the applicability and scope
of any potential NEPA review have not yet been determined.
Permitting
for the new facility at the State and Federal level, assuming that a NEPA is not required, is assumed to take one year to complete. If
a NEPA is required, however, permitting could take up to three years to complete.
5.5 Execution
Schedule
A
high-level project execution schedule, for the Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project, including Pre-Feasibility Study, Feasibility and
FEED project development stages, is presented in Appendix A. All durations are based on preliminary information and/or experience from
other projects.
Permitting
tasks have been included assuming that a NEPA will not be required and that permit documents can be developed based on interim Feasibility
level documents.
Development
of a novel process is a journey of discovery and is therefore unpredictable. The path forward should be re-evaluated following completion
of each development phase. In some cases, design concepts may need to be changed and a project engineering phase repeated accordingly.
This
schedule is presented to facilitate discussions regarding project execution strategies.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0
Page 5-14
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026
Appendix
A:
Execution Schedule
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 5 - Preliminary Execution Strategy and Schedule - July 28, 2026
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE05, Rev. 0
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 6 - Project Risks and Opportunities - July 28, 2026
Ramaco
Resources
Brook
Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial
Assessment Report - Section 6 - Project Risks and Opportunities
2026-07-28
0
Issued
for Use
G.
Maskaluk
J.
Gorst
F.
Delgado
Date
Rev.
Status
Prepared
By
Checked
By
Approved
By
Approved
By
Client
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE06, Rev. 0
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 6 - Project Risks and Opportunities - July 28, 2026
Table
of Contents
6.
Project Risks
and Opportunities
6-1
6.1
General Risks
6-1
6.2
Opportunities
6-2
6.2.1
Chlorine Recovery
from PVC
6-2
6.2.2
E-Waste Feed Integration
6-7
6.2.3
Execution Schedule Acceleration
6-8
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE06, Rev. 0
Page 6-i
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 6 - Project Risks and Opportunities - July 28, 2026
6. Project
Risks and Opportunities
A
risk register has not been developed for this phase of the project. A risk review and register preparation are recommended to be prepared
at the start of the pre-feasibility study, for the selected flowsheet. Higher risks and opportunities are summarized in the sections
below.
6.1 General
Risks
Major
risks that apply to the current flowsheet include:
● Preparation
of flowsheet for separation may be compromised due to lack of definition on project concept.
The project concept needs to be defined based on test work data in the next phase of the
project.
● Test
work for the current flowsheet including carbo-chlorination is not available, as such, the
process definition cannot be frozen. Additional updates/rework may be required if test work
results indicate changes to the process definition.
● Pyrometallurgical
equipment operability will likely be lower than the overall plant operation (92%) due to
the limited experience with the equipment. More frequent and longer downtimes may be required,
especially in early phases of plant operation.
● The
nitrogen and oxygen demand may increase based on incoming test work data, changes in process
definition, and equipment modification. Specifically, the carbo-chlorination units may require
oxygen addition to maintain the target operating temperatures. The Air Separation Plant footprint,
power demand, and equipment fee will be impacted if the demand for nitrogen and oxygen gases
increases.
● The
quartz removal efficiency from the beneficiation area has not been confirmed. Larger equipment
may be needed in all areas downstream of the beneficiation if the quartz removal is less
efficient than expected.
● A
more robust off-gas treatment system may be needed for the project. Off-gas species and amounts
from pyrometallurgical units need to be confirmed.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE06, Rev. 0
Page 6-1
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 6 - Project Risks and Opportunities - July 28, 2026
● Many
equipment pieces are preliminary customizations for the new flowsheet including the carbo-chlorination
units. Bespoke equipment will require additional testing and definition to ensure their operability
at a commercial scale.
6.2 Opportunities
A
list of opportunities identified by Ramaco for the selected flowsheet are outlined below.
6.2.1 Chlorine
Recovery from PVC
The
recovery of chlorine gas from scrap polyvinyl chloride (PVC) by thermal pyrolysis and HCl oxidation was identified by Ramaco as a potential
opportunity to reduce the amount of purchased Cl2, and thereby operating cost, for the carbo-chlorination circuit. Through
the “Technical Opportunity Statement PVC Waste Pyrolysis as a Chlorine Make-Up Source for Carbochlorination” dated
May 2026, Ramaco requested that Hatch obtain budget-level capital and operating cost estimates from HCl oxidation vendors. The following
subsections summarize Hatch’s correspondence with specialist vendors Sumitomo Chemical (Section 6.2.1.1) and Thyssenkrupp Nucera
(Section 6.2.1.2), as well as a preliminary list of additional considerations that may need to be addressed in subsequent engineering
phases (Section 6.2.1.3).
6.2.1.1 Sumitomo
Chemical HCl Oxidation Process
Sumitomo
Chemical is a technology licensing supplier of a Deacon HCl oxidation process to produce a chlorine gas product. Technip Energies owns
the exclusive licensing rights to Sumitomo Chemical’s HCl oxidation technology. Hatch has engaged in preliminary discussions with
Technip Energies, and a summary of the correspondence can be found below. Note that an NDA must be executed to receive capital and operating
cost estimates.
● Sumitomo
Chemical has 23 years of experience in HCl oxidation with their first commercial installation
in 2003. Currently they have 10 installed licensees, primarily in the MDI/TDI industries
● Sumitomo
Chemical owns the technology and supplies the catalyst, Technip Energies licenses the technology,
and JFE Engineering Corporation supplies the reactor
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE06, Rev. 0
Page 6-2
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 6 - Project Risks and Opportunities - July 28, 2026
● In
Sumitomo Chemical’s HCl oxidation process gaseous HCl and oxygen is fed to a fixed-bed
tubular reactor to produce chlorine gas. The exothermic energy released from HCl oxidation
is recovered to produce steam. The chlorine gas is then scrubbed with water to remove unreacted
HCl, producing a by-product of muriatic acid. The chlorine gas is then dried using sulphuric
acid and purified to remove inert gases. A schematic of the process can be found in Figure
6-1.
● Chlorine
gas purity: 99.7 vol.% (for MDI/TDI references)
● HCl
conversion: ~85%
♦ Increased
to ~90% conversion with the addition of an HCl stripper
♦ Increased
to ~98% conversion with full azeotropic distillation system
● Reactor
catalyst: RuO2/TiO2
● Catalyst
lifespan: >2 year (typically 2.5 years)
♦ HCl
feed purity can significantly influence the catalyst lifespan. Impurities such as bromides,
sulphur, and organics will reduce catalyst lifespan. Impurity definition is crucial for assessing
catalyst replacement frequency and overall suitability of Sumitomo Chemical HCl oxidation
process
● A
single train can be designed within the production range of 60-240 ktpa of chlorine gas
● Energy
consumption of Sumitomo Chemical’s process is approximately 8-10 times less than HCl
electrolysis with oxygen-depolarized cathode
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE06, Rev. 0
Page 6-3
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 6 - Project Risks and Opportunities - July 28, 2026
Figure
6-1: Sumitomo Chemical HCl Oxidation Process Schematic
6.2.1.2 Thyssenkrupp
Nucera HCl Oxidation Process
Thyssenkrupp
Nucera provides an oxygen-depolarized cathode hydrochloric acid (ODC-HCl) electrolysis technology to produce a chlorine gas product.
Hatch has engaged in preliminary discussions with Thyssenkrupp, and a summary of the correspondence can be found below.
In
addition, Thyssenkrupp has provided an order of magnitude plant area cost of 120,000,000 Euro, inclusive of engineering and bulking material
for piping, electrical, and instrumentation. Cost associated with structural steel, civil works, and erection activities are excluded.
Estimated utility and power consumption was also provided.
Note
that Thyssenkrupp is discussing internally if an NDA is required to provide capital and operating cost estimates.
● Thyssenkrupp
Nucera has over 600 electrochemical plant references and 40 references providing full engineering,
procurement, and construction services.
● In
the ODC-HCl process, hydrochloric gas and demineralized water are fed to an HCl absorber
to produce a 28-37 wt.% HCl solution. This solution is mixed with a depleted recirculating
HCl solution to create a 14 wt.% HCl solution for feeding to the anode side of the electrolysis
cell where anodic oxidation occurs, producing chlorine gas. Oxygen is fed on the cathode
side to react with hydrogen ions to produce an acid wastewater stream. A schematic of the
process can be found in Figure 6-2.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE06, Rev. 0
Page 6-4
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 6 - Project Risks and Opportunities - July 28, 2026
● Chlorine
gas purity: not provided.
● HCl
conversion: ~98%.
● Cathode
and anode replacement/refurbishment frequency was not provided.
● Membrane
lifespan: 4-8 years.
● The
target chlorine gas production of 10-11 tph is within the technologies capability and aligns
with other built plants.
● Operational
flexibility is a key advantage of the ODC-HCl process as it can operate at lowered Cl2
throughput capacities and increasing HCl production if desirable based on market conditions.
● Disadvantage
of the electrolysis process is high electrical power consumption.
● Thyssenkrupp
highlighted the importance of mitigating impurities, particularly organics. Impurity definition
is crucial for assessing membrane replacement frequency and overall suitability of the HCl-ODC
process.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE06, Rev. 0
Page 6-5
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 6 - Project Risks and Opportunities - July 28, 2026
Figure
6-2: ThyssenKrupp Nucera HCl-ODC Electrolysis Process Schematic
6.2.1.3 Future
Considerations
To
further develop the potential opportunity to recover chlorine gas from scrap PVC, Hatch has prepared a preliminary list of considerations
be addressed in subsequent engineering phases:
● Receive
preliminary cost estimates from HCl oxidation vendors (on-going).
● Identification
of scrap PVC supply source and composition.
● Ideation
session(s) should be completed to identify suitable reactor(s) for PVC thermal pyrolysis
at a commercial scale.
● Mass
and energy balance, order of magnitude capital and operational cost assessment of selected
pyrolysis technology.
● Pyrolysis
reactor test work to confirm reactor viability and define off-gas impurities.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE06, Rev. 0
Page 6-6
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 6 - Project Risks and Opportunities - July 28, 2026
● Provide
HCl oxidation vendor(s) updated HCl gas composition to determine HCl gas treatment requirements
to adhere with vendor inlet specifications. This will also inform off-gas equipment selection.
● Order
of magnitude capital and operating cost of the complete PVC to chlorine flowsheet to assess
economic viability.
6.2.2 E-Waste
Feed Integration
Ramaco
identified a potential opportunity to increase gallium and germanium production through the addition of an electronic waste (“e-waste”)
feed to be processed in the current carbo-chlorination process. Through the “Technical Opportunity Statement Gallium- and Germanium-Rich
E-Waste as a Critical Mineral Feed Sweetener for Carbochlorination” dated May 2026, Ramaco has requested that Hatch determines
the feasibility of processing a feed enriched with less than 3 wt.% e-waste through the current carbo-chlorination process.
Hatch
recognises this as an opportunity. It is expected that all critical minerals will chlorinate in the carbo-chlorination process. However,
the following should be investigated in the next phases of the project:
● Definition
of the e-waste feed composition, including organics, sulphur, copper, mercury, lead, arsenic,
halides, etc. The complete composition is will be used to evaluate if additional processing
steps are necessary to remove impurities to meet to emissions/waste requirements and product
specifications.
● Halides
are common in e-waste and may produce acid gases. Definition of halide levels is required
to determine if additional processing steps are required to remove acid gases and to determine
if materials of construction as currently selected are suitable.
● Test
work on the feed blend is recommended to determine the calorific value generated from organics
combustion to better understand the energy balance impact on the carbo-chlorination reactor.
It may be possible that organic combustion could offset some of the reactor fuel requirement.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE06, Rev. 0
Page 6-7
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 6 - Project Risks and Opportunities - July 28, 2026
● Currently,
the carbo-chlorination reactor is expected to operate with sub-stoichiometric oxygen addition
which may promote volatilization of organics. Other operations that process e-waste in starved
air conditions (in rotary kilns) would suggest that volatilization of organics is expected
to occur. Impact of organics in the sublimation process should be investigated to determine
if an after burner, or other equipment is required.
● Assess
if the addition of e-waste to the carbo-chlorination reactor could impact the ability to
maintain fluidization.
● Arsenic
is reported to be in the e-waste as GaAs. Arsenic chloride may be generated in the carbo-chlorination
reactor and is considered highly toxic. HAZOPs should be conducted to ensure the process
and plant is safely designed for the presence of arsenic chloride.
● Review
arsenic emission limits to inform if additional process steps are required to adhere to such
limits.
● Evaluation
of how to separate arsenic chloride from valuable metallic chlorides should be completed.
This may require test work.
● Mass
balance should be competed to determine if current carbo-chlorination reactors and downstream
equipment are appropriately sized for the increased Ga and Ge production.
● Identify
which, if any, regulations, permitting requirements, waste specifications would be applicable
when processing e-waste to inform equipment selection and additional process steps if required.
● Order
of magnitude capital and operating cost estimation to assess economic viability.
6.2.3 Execution
Schedule Acceleration
An
opportunity to accelerate the overall project execution schedule was identified and preliminarily assessed by the project team and is
presented herein for discussion purposes. The opportunity has not been subject to detailed engineering, execution planning, risk assessment,
or commercial evaluation and should therefore be considered a conceptual schedule acceleration scenario rather than a fully developed
execution strategy.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE06, Rev. 0
Page 6-8
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 6 - Project Risks and Opportunities - July 28, 2026
This
accelerated execution strategy assumes that several key engineering, procurement, and project development activities are initiated prior
to Full Approval to Proceed (FID) and before all project uncertainties have been fully resolved. These early commitments are required
to maintain the accelerated project schedule and to prevent long-lead activities from becoming critical path constraints.
Key
early commitments include:
● Progression
of Basic Engineering/FEED to a level sufficient to support permit applications, early works
design, and procurement activities.
● Advancement
of Detailed Engineering packages for site preparation, civil works, utilities, and critical
process systems prior to project sanction.
● Early
release of engineering work packages to support tendering, vendor engagement, and equipment
specification development.
● Procurement
of long-lead and critical equipment based on preliminary design information to secure manufacturing
capacity and delivery dates.
● Placement
of early purchase orders, letters of intent, or reservation agreements for equipment with
extended fabrication durations.
● Advancement
of geotechnical investigations, site characterization programs, and construction planning
activities to support early works execution.
● Mobilization
of owner and EPCM resources earlier than would typically occur under a conventional stage-gated
project development process.
These
activities would require expenditure of capital prior to FID and may commit the project to specific design solutions before completion
of detailed engineering and final commercial evaluations. Consequently, changes arising from ongoing engineering development, permitting
requirements, technology optimization, constructability reviews, market conditions, or project sanction decisions could result in engineering
rework, procurement changes, contract amendments, schedule disruption, or additional cost.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE06, Rev. 0
Page 6-9
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 6 - Project Risks and Opportunities - July 28, 2026
As
a result, while early engineering and procurement commitments are essential to achieving the accelerated schedule, they increase project
execution, commercial, and financial risk relative to a conventional development approach where major engineering and procurement commitments
are deferred until after Full Approval to Proceed has been received.
Under
this scenario, project Handover to Operations for Start-up could potentially be achieved approximately seven months earlier than the
conventional execution approach, as presented in Figure 6-3.
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE06, Rev. 0
Page 6-10
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
Ramaco Resources - Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
Initial Assessment Report - Section 6 - Project Risks and Opportunities - July 28, 2026
Figure
6-3: Opportunity to Accelerate Execution Schedule
H376597-0000-100-146-0002_SE06, Rev. 0
Page 6-11
© Hatch 2026 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents.
EX-99.2 — SHAREHOLDER LETTER ISSUED BY RAMACO RESOURCES, INC. DATED JULY 29, 2026
EX-99.2
Filename: ea029953301ex99-2.htm · Sequence: 3
Exhibit 99.2
July 29, 2026
Dear Shareholders,
Over the past several quarterly releases and earnings remarks we have
discussed our ongoing work to develop our rare earth and other critical mineral operations at the exploratory Brook Mine in Wyoming. Since
my last Letter to Shareholders in September 2025, we have continued a fundamental internal realignment to create a dual-platform structure,
with our metallurgical coal and potential critical mineral businesses as distinct operating entities. In this letter, I will focus on
our emerging rare earth and other critical mineral operations.
Our last independent conceptual study of the Brook Mine project was
conducted by Fluor Corp. and released in July 2025 (the “Fluor Report”). Today, we are releasing a new independent conceptual
study from Hatch Associates Consultants, Inc. (“Hatch”). Hatch was engaged to provide a preliminary refining process definition
to be used in a future technical report summary and initial assessment of the economic potential of the Brook Mine Critical Mineral Project
1(“Project”).
The Fluor report analyzed the separation and extraction processing
of the various critical minerals and rare earths into oxides at our proposed mine-mouth critical mineral refinery (“CMR”)
using a conventional technique called solvent extraction. The Fluor report also identified alternative processing techniques that we investigated
further after the initial report was published.
The Hatch report analyzed the flowsheet design for the CMR to process,
separate and extract critical minerals and rare earths into mineral oxides, metals and mixed rare earth carbonate (“MREC”).
Hatch’s focus of analysis was a carbochlorination processing technique which I describe below.
The CMR will be a central component of our proposed vertically integrated
critical mineral supply chain Project co-located at our Brook Mine site in Sheridan, Wyoming. This complex will encompass the upstream
feedstock mining operations at our Brook Mine, midstream processing of oxides and MREC at the CMR and downstream commercial sales and
product marketing coordinated through our Strategic Critical Mineral Stockpile and Terminal (“SCMT”).
Since last July, we have brought onto our Ramaco team the two former
senior Fluor team members who prepared that report to help guide our metallurgical test work and advance our processing design efforts
at the CMR. This led to a fundamental reassessment of the optimal processing method to separate and refine our unique carbonaceous critical
mineral feedstock contained in relatively soft, coal and contiguous clays and shales. The refining technique we arrived at is called carbochlorination,
which we have previously disclosed. We have also filed for patent protection on its application to our updated flowsheet.
1 Note
the Hatch report is at an initial assessment level of study and, accordingly, all estimates and projections contained therein are based
on limited and preliminary data. The estimates were completed to AACE Class 5 with an accuracy of -35/+50% with a contingency of 30%
on the process plant. The assessment was based on 100% inferred mineral resources which are speculative, and there is no certainty that
the results of the Initial Assessment will be realized. However, if no Inferred mineral resources were included in the cash flow of the
Initial Assessment, then there would be no project. Therefore, while the work, results, estimates and projections are not definitive,
they may nonetheless be considered generally indicative of the nature and quality of the Project.
This is a proven processing method which has been used in the titanium
industry for over 75 years. Through ongoing geological, mineralogical and metallurgical analysis and testing, this new flowsheet was adapted
and refined to process the unconventional feedstock coming from the Brook Mine. The objective was to improve the potential critical mineral
and rare earth feedstock separations and extractions to produce oxides and MREC.
Today’s study from Hatch analyzed the overall Project and specifically
the CMR using this revised carbochlorination process and then provided independent preliminary estimates of capital and operating costs.
Hatch in turn relied on another independent analysis of the carbochlorination process itself, which was conducted by Kingston Process
Metallurgy, Inc. (“KPM”).
The change in the refining process method has a dramatic impact not
only on our estimates of the Brook Mine project economics, but also on the allocation of the potential critical mineral and rare earth
product slate we expect to be capable of producing.
This initial assessment using the current Hatch report will be superseded
by a full Preliminary Feasibility Study (“PFS”), which will further define the Project. As part of the PFS study Hatch will
test and confirm additional opportunities such as recycling electronic waste (“e-waste”) into our feedstock stream with the
objective of enhancing realizations, as explained below.
The key highlights for our investors that are presented below are
from both the Hatch report (we have incorporated their independent capital and operating cost estimates) and separately from our own
internal projected economics for the Brook Mine Project. Investors should note that the figures below on NPV8, IRR, adjusted EBITDA and
revenue were internally prepared estimates by Ramaco. They have not been independently verified, and are superimposed on Hatch’s
independent operating cost and capital expenditure estimates2:
● The
Brook Mine NPV has increased 567% to $8.0 billion before tax, and increased 537% to $6.4 billion after tax since the release of our 2025
third-party Fluor Report. This increase primarily reflects a change to a carbochlorination processing methodology referred to in the
Hatch report from Fluor’s solvent-extraction methodology in their 2025 study. Because of this change, the two studies do not have
functional equivalency. This NPV is shown visually below with cash flows through 2034 but reflects a 40-year mine life. It does not
reflect the potential multi-generational mine life referenced elsewhere in this letter.
● Average projected annual adjusted EBITDA of $1.3 billion is up almost ~800%
from that same report3. Analogous to the NPV comparison, this increase reflects the change in processing methodology to the
carbochlorination technique rather than organic project improvement, and the figures are not directly comparable to the Fluor report on
an equivalent basis.
2 The
economic estimates in this letter, including the NPV, IRR, adjusted EBITDA and revenue figures, are preliminary in nature and are based
on inferred mineral resources. Inferred mineral resources are categorized as too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations
applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and therefore there is no certainty that these preliminary
economic estimates will be realized. These estimates are internally prepared by Ramaco and are not the output of an “initial assessment,”
pre-feasibility study or feasibility study prepared by a qualified person under Regulation S-K, Subpart 1300. A pre-feasibility study
will be necessary to support the production schedule laid out in the economics, including the timing of construction and commercial operation.
2
● The above estimated NPV and adjusted EBITDA figures do not factor in any
additional potential economic upside or processing efficiency from the use of blending recycled e-waste and PVC waste into our feedstock
before processing. Hatch has independently confirmed this as an opportunity, subject to further testing and investigation planned for
this year and expected to be addressed in the PFS. We have also filed for patent protection on both of these recycling methods.
● The capital for construction of the project is preliminarily estimated by
Hatch at $3.2 billion, with an additional contingency of ~$0.8 billion1. We anticipate that these figures may be higher than
the ultimate final construction numbers given the current early stage of process design which is prior to pilot testing to optimize design
and equipment requirements which may reduce the contingency.
● Scandium remains an important component of our product slate at 18% of projected
revenue. However, this is significantly reduced from prior solvent-extraction figures, under which scandium previously accounted for more
than half of our project revenue. Although scandium’s share of projected revenue has declined under the carbochlorination flowsheet,
we continue to regard scandium as a strategically important product. We do not expect this change in product mix to affect existing customer
or governmental interest.
● The
switch from solvent extraction to the new carbochlorination flowsheet is expected to allow approximately 75% of anticipated Brook Mine
revenue to be tied to commodities whose primary demand driver is the semiconductor industry such as gallium metal, germanium oxide, high-purity
silica (“HPS”) and high-purity alumina (“HPA”). Given the expected growth in all forms of computerized related
commerce such as data centers and AI, we view this as a strong underpinning of the future market for oxide and related products from
the Brook Mine.
Key Economics of Brook Mine Project
Below are the key projected economic details of the Brook Mine Project3.
The key inputs for the financial model include:
● A life-of-mine production schedule derived from the optimized pit shell.
● Capital and operating cost estimates used by Hatch in its conceptual study,
using Hatch’s upsized production case.
● Third-party inputs, such as extraction rates from metallurgical testing,
to estimate overall recoveries and inform annual production levels.
Ramaco then applied discounts to internally researched Western spot
prices to arrive at internally prepared annual cash flow figures. As such, the NPV, IRR, adjusted EBITDA, payback period and revenue
figures4 in this report are Ramaco’s internal estimates.
3 The preliminary economic estimates described in this letter have not been prepared as part of an initial assessment, pre-feasibility study
or feasibility study under Item 1302 of Regulation S-K, and no Technical Report Summary has been filed with respect to these estimates.
The Company expects to file an S-K 1300 compliant Technical Report Summary by the end of the calendar year 2026.
4 Adjusted
EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. Because the amounts presented are forward-looking projections, the Company is unable to reconcile
projected adjusted EBITDA to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure without unreasonable effort, primarily due to the difficulty
of predicting the timing and amount of items that would be required for a GAAP measure, including future capital expenditures, taxes,
financing costs and other non-cash or non-recurring items, which may be significant.
3
Our internally prepared financial model below shows the Brook Mine’s
potential to generate significant economic value, delivering compelling ongoing cash flows as well as after-tax NPV and IRR. The strength
of these financial metrics demonstrates the underlying asset quality and supports continued investment in advancing the Project toward
production.
The above projected economics are based on figures in the Hatch report
using 2.6 million tonnes of critical mineral feedstock processed into the CMR. In addition to the 2.6 million tonnes of critical mineral
feedstock, the carbochlorination process allows for an additional ~0.9 million tonnes of mineralized coal to be processed through the
plant, which results in additional saleable MREC product.
The Hatch report also provided alternative figures calculated on a
lower 1.3-million-tonne critical mineral feedstock case— which established a scalable, lower-capital baseline that could be incrementally
upsized based on demand—and the higher feedstock input.
Our economics are shown visually through 2034, although our discounted
NPV accounts for a 40-year mine life. As further drilling and analysis occurs, we anticipate the Brook Mine has the potential to meaningfully
exceed its currently estimated mine life only utilizing the 4,500 acres currently permitted for mining. As previously disclosed, there
are an additional ~11,500 acres contiguous to the permitted area on which we are performing drilling and geological analysis.
4
The next chart below compares a summary of the general economic results
from both the current Hatch report and last year’s Fluor report, with production units shown in tonnes.
The next chart below details the potential key product suite and each
product’s contribution to internally calculated revenue. As noted, the carbochlorination flowsheet allows for approximately 75%
of our anticipated Brook Mine Project internally prepared revenue to be tied to key commodities such as gallium metal, germanium oxide,
HPA and HPS whose primary demand driver is the semiconductor industry.
The price deck we used for this analysis, when compared with current
Western spot prices, is shown in the next chart below. For commodities with a quoted Western spot price (such as gallium and key rare
earths), we show that price. For commodities with a recent market transaction marker (such as the U.S. Department of War purchase of scandium),
we use that as a market reference. Where neither exists, we use third party consensus or similar long-term pricing, without price escalation
over the life of mine.
5
The key takeaway: we are modeling our projections using material discounts
across all oxide, metal, MREC, other critical mineral products and HPS. We believe that, given the geopolitical and supply-chain realities,
any comparison to Chinese government-published spot indexes is fundamentally misguided.
Because the projected economics are strongly dependent on realized
commodity prices and the discounts we apply, changes in those assumptions would have a corresponding effect on projected NPV, IRR, adjusted
EBITDA and revenue. We have not presented a sensitivity analysis illustrating how these metrics would vary under alternative pricing scenarios,
and investors should not assume that the modeled prices or discounts will be realized.
Key Details
Beyond the highlights noted above, below is additional detail on key
aspects of the Brook Mine Project based on Hatch analysis of the carbochlorination flowsheet and our internally prepared projections:
● Financials:
Pre-tax NPV8 of $8.0 billion — a 567% increase from
the previous flowsheet. Pre-tax IRR of 24%. Adjusted annual EBITDA averages $1.3 billion over the mine life, with $1.7 billion
in average annual revenue.
● Production:
The total feed to the plant includes inferred resources
of carbonaceous clays and mineralized coal. Over the life of mine, the average grades of critical mineral oxide (“CMO”)5
are 416 ppm, as well as 7.6% Al and 21.0% Si.
Over a 40-year mine life, average annual feed to the carbochlorination
facility is ~3.5 million tonnes of enriched carbonaceous clays and shales as well as mineralized coal (~2.6 million tonnes of clays/shales
and ~0.9 million tonnes of coal). Average annual production is included in the Brook Mine Summary table above, which includes revenue
from approximately 1.5 million tonnes per year of thermal coal. As previously disclosed, we intend to use the coal as the “carbo”
reagent in the carbochlorination process and/or to sell the remaining coal into the power markets.
5 CMO
includes oxides of Sc, Y, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu plus Ga and Ge.
6
● Flowsheet:
Small amounts of the kaolinite in the enriched clay zones are converted
into HPA and HPS by reaction with chlorine. Approximately 5% of the Al2O3 associated with kaolinite is converted
to HPA and 2.5% of the SiO2. Volatile chloride compounds, which include gallium, germanium, alumina and silica are then recovered,
separated and purified from the gaseous stream. The mineralized coal serves as a carbon source and necessary reagent, contributing incremental
rare earth and other critical mineral production. Rare earths are converted to chlorides but predominantly remain in the residue where
they are leached with water. Impurities are removed before precipitation of an MREC that will be sold to be refined by a third party.
Gallium’s thermodynamic behavior under carbochlorination
conditions is well established — it reports efficiently as a vapor in the off-gas where it is recovered and purified. We intend
to produce gallium metal to access higher-value end markets across semiconductors, AI server power electronics, precision optics, and
5G/6G networks.
Carbochlorination extracts meaningfully both more product
and revenue from the Brook Mine deposit than we achieved in the conventional hydrometallurgical process. It has additional benefits, including
lower water consumption and flowsheet simplification through production of MREC rather than solvent-extraction separation. The expanded
product suite provides meaningful exposure to supply chain security across semiconductors, aerospace, defense, and magnets.
● Extraction Recoveries:
Independent testing at KPM’s third-party lab achieved
high carbochlorination extractions for all key revenue generating critical minerals and silica. The Brook Mine feedstock was effectively
consumed in the carbochlorination tests with initial results from KPM showing original average extraction levels over 90%. Further testing
now indicates upside from recoveries exceeding 98%. Recovery projections were estimated downstream to determine overall plant recoveries.
Further test work is planned in Q3 at Ramaco’s own
laboratory facility to expand the test program at bench-scale to validate metallurgical performance throughout the flowsheet and optimize
operating conditions. Further recovery results will be included in the PFS.
● E-waste Opportunity:
We are evaluating the technical viability and economics
of incorporating electronic waste (e-waste) blended into the feedstock, with sourcing efforts targeting e-waste containing higher concentrations
of gallium and germanium. Because carbochlorination effectively extracts REEs and other critical minerals, even small amounts of e-waste
could significantly increase revenue from material otherwise destined for landfill — particularly gallium and germanium-rich waste,
which is difficult to recycle by other methods. We will also explore other possible forms of e-waste targeting additional products6.
6 Incorporating
e-waste and PVC waste as feedstock may subject these activities to hazardous-waste handling and permitting requirements under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and comparable state laws, and any internationally sourced e-waste may be subject to U.S. import
restrictions. We will evaluate these regulatory considerations as part of our ongoing testing and the PFS.
7
● Product Offtake:
We remain in advanced stages of product offtake discussions
with potential domestic groups, both private and governmental, as well as international groups.
In parallel with the technical work
supporting the Hatch report, we have advanced a comprehensive commercial strategy focused on integrating future Brook Mine oxide, metal,
and MREC products into domestic and allied critical mineral supply chains. In support of these efforts, Ramaco has hired and onboarded
internal marketing and sales staff dedicated solely to the Brook Mine materials, as well as contracted several consultants who specialize
in specific minerals and supply chains.
With this expanded commercial capability,
Ramaco has now established relationships across the downstream value chains for each of the principal Brook Mine products. Ramaco is pursuing
a framework of prospective offtake agreements, whether formally via MOUs or informally. These should mature into negotiation of definitive
commercial agreements as Brook Mine products progress through laboratory qualification and pilot-scale production.
Also, recognizing that the Brook Mine
critical mineral deposit was discovered in partnership with the U.S. government, Ramaco continues to build relationships within government
to support the strategic initiatives to onshore Western critical mineral supply chains. We are in active discussion with the Department
of War, the Department of Commerce and also maintain our on-going involvement with the Department of Energy.
● Financing:
We are currently in discussions regarding a variety of third-party
project financing regarding funding for the CMR involving the public and private sectors, including U.S. governmental groups mentioned
above. Details will be disclosed when transactions are advanced to the point of specific documentation.
I would note that our major capital requirements for the
CMR are more than two years away. Our future testing, pilot plant and mining capital requirements can all be met from current internal
funds. We also expect that there will be substantial future risk mitigation to the project in the form of offtake agreements, greater
clarity of the level of capital requirements from further design and process optimization and, of course, technological refinements to
the overall critical mineral refining and separation process.
We are well capitalized, patient and methodical. We will
strive to finance the project to obtain the strongest possible value for our shareholders.
8
● Capital Cost:
In Hatch’s upsized case, total initial pre-production capital
cost estimates are $3.2 billion before a $0.8 billion contingency, or $4.0 billion in total post-contingency. The capital cost estimate
completed by Hatch for the process facility corresponds to an AACE Class 5 estimate, with an accuracy range of -35%/+50% and a 30% contingency
applied within Hatch’s scope for the process plant.
The higher capital cost at this stage of the carbochlorination
process versus the earlier hydrometallurgical process reflects:
o feed preparation requirements for mineralized coal,
o a more conservative view of reaction kinetics (versus the titanium industry) impacting the size and thickness of reactors (and thus
cost) pending further testing in the pilot phase,
o higher product production tonnages, and
o conservative selection of materials for construction pending further engineering evaluation.
The next project phase will include the exploration of opportunities
to meaningfully reduce anticipated capital cost impacts.
We have provided owner’s estimates for certain costs
including mine fleet, mine development, residue storage, rail loadout, permitting and regulatory matters, infrastructure outside the process
plant battery limit, and the owner’s operating team.
● Execution Schedule:
We requested that Hatch provide an accelerated project execution
plan for construction and development of the CMR. The table below provides high-level milestones per Hatch’s accelerated timeline. This
strategy assumes that key engineering, procurement, and development activities are initiated prior to Final Investment Decision (“FID”)
and before all project uncertainties are fully resolved. These early commitments are required to maintain the accelerated schedule and
to prevent long-lead activities from becoming critical-path constraints.
● Geological Advancement:
We have continued an aggressive on-going program of geological
study and assessment of the 4,500 acres permitted area of the deposit. To date we have drilled 684 core holes (equaling roughly 11 miles
of coring). We have conducted ~7,500 ICP-MS tests on samples, plus ~34,000 XRF tests. We will continue this comprehensive level of testing
in order to add detail to the characterization of the mineral resource and to advance its classification from inferred to indicated. We
will also move to further geological testing on the balance of the roughly 11,500 additional acres which have not yet been permitted.
9
● Pilot Plant Advancement:
Construction of the pilot plant has continued to progress
this summer, with completion of the building shell anticipated this October. Based on receipt of further design criteria from Hatch, we
expect Zeton, Inc. to begin engineering in Q3 2026. The fabricated equipment modules from Zeton are then projected to ship for installation
in the first half of 2027 with the pilot plant becoming fully operational later in 2027.
Once that building shell is complete this fall, chemical,
metallurgical and geological testing operations will begin at this new location, in addition to those being conducted at our existing
iCAM research center in Sheridan.
Addressing U.S. and Global Market Demand
As previously noted, the Brook Critical Mineral Project
complex — including the Brook Mine itself, combined with the midstream CMR refinery and downstream SCMT marketing terminal —
has the potential to supply a substantial volume of the processed oxide, metal and MREC needed to meet meaningful levels of both U.S.
domestic and international demand.
The chart below shows the potential annual Brook Project
product slate production compared with current levels of U.S. and global demand.
In closing, we look forward to providing more commentary on our Q2
earnings call, which is scheduled for August 5th. We will also continue to provide periodic updates on significant milestones as development
of the Brook Mine critical mineral and rare earth project unfolds over the coming months.
All the best,
/s/ Randall
W. Atkins
Randall W. Atkins
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
10
ABOUT RAMACO RESOURCES
Ramaco Resources, Inc. is an operator and developer of high-quality,
low-cost metallurgical coal in southern West Virginia and southwestern Virginia, and is exploring a coal, rare earth and other critical
minerals project in Wyoming. The Company’s executive offices are located in Lexington, Kentucky, with operational offices in Charleston,
West Virginia and Sheridan, Wyoming. The Company currently has four active metallurgical coal mining complexes in Central Appalachia and
one coal mine and rare earth element and other critical mineral exploration stage property near Sheridan, Wyoming (the “Brook Mine”).
The Brook Mine remains an exploration stage property, and no assurance can be given that it will be successfully developed into a commercial
scale mine or that any inferred mineral resources estimated will be converted into higher confidence mineral resources or eventually mineral
reserves. Contiguous to the Brook Mine, the Company operates a carbon research facility related to the potential production of advanced
carbon products and materials from coal. In connection with these activities, it holds a body of more than 70 intellectual property patents,
pending applications, exclusive licensing agreements and various trademarks. News and additional information about Ramaco Resources, including
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, are available at https://www.ramacoresources.com.
For more information, contact investor relations at (859) 244-7455.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements contained in this Shareholder Letter constitute
“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including, but not
limited to, statements related to future production volumes and sales, anticipated capital expenditures, expected demand for metallurgical
coal, the development and commercialization of the Brook Mine rare earth and critical mineral project, projected operating costs and margins,
and the Company’s financial guidance and outlook. These forward-looking statements represent Ramaco Resources’ expectations or beliefs
concerning guidance, future events, anticipated revenue, future demand and production levels, macroeconomic trends, the development of
ongoing projects, costs and expectations regarding operating results, and it is possible that the results described in this news release
will not be achieved.
These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties
and other factors, many of which are outside of Ramaco Resources’ control, which could cause actual results to differ materially from
the results discussed in the forward-looking statements.
These factors include, without limitation, unexpected delays in our
current mine development activities, the ability to successfully increase production at our existing met coal complexes in accordance
with the Company’s growth initiatives, failure of our sales commitment counterparties to perform, increased government regulation of coal
in the United States or internationally, the impact of tariffs imposed by the United States and foreign governments, the further decline
of demand for coal in export markets and underperformance of the railroads, the Company’s ability to successfully develop the exploratory
Brook Mine rare earth and critical mineral project, including whether the Company’s exploration target and estimates for such mine are
realized, the timing of the initial production of rare earth concentrates, the development of a pilot and ultimately a full-scale commercial
processing facility. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not meet the threshold for reserve modifying factors, such as estimated
economic viability, that would allow for conversion to mineral reserves. There is no certainty that any part of the inferred mineral resources
estimated at Brook Mine will be converted into higher confidence mineral resources and eventually mineral reserves in the future. Rare
earth and critical minerals are a new initiative for us and, as such, have required and will continue to require us to make significant
investments to build out our rare earth and other critical mineral capabilities.
11
Additional factors specific to the Brook Mine economic estimates include,
without limitation: the preliminary nature of the estimates and their reliance on inferred mineral resources, which are too speculative
to be classified as mineral reserves; the fact that the NPV, IRR, adjusted EBITDA and revenue figures are Ramaco’s internally prepared
estimates that have not been independently verified; the wide accuracy range of the capital cost estimate, which is an AACE Class 5 estimate
with an accuracy range of -35%/+50% (meaning the $4.0 billion post-contingency estimate could reasonably range from approximately $2.6
billion to $6.0 billion); the sensitivity of the projected economics to realized commodity prices and applied discounts, for which no
sensitivity analysis has been presented; the risk that anticipated non-dilutive project financing may not be available on acceptable terms
or at all, which could require the Company to raise additional capital, including equity that could dilute existing shareholders; and
regulatory risks associated with the planned incorporation of electronic waste and PVC waste as feedstock, including hazardous-waste handling
requirements under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and comparable state laws, as well as potential import restrictions
on internationally sourced e-waste.
Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it
is made, and, except as required by law, Ramaco Resources does not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement,
whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for Ramaco
Resources to predict all such factors. When considering these forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the risk factors and
other cautionary statements found in Ramaco Resources’ filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including
its Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. The risk factors and other factors noted in Ramaco Resources’ SEC filings
could cause its actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement.
12
EX-99.3 — PRESS RELEASE ISSUED BY RAMACO RESOURCES, INC. DATED JULY 29, 2026
EX-99.3
Filename: ea029953301ex99-3.htm · Sequence: 4
Exhibit 99.3
Ramaco Resources Releases Hatch Report and Shareholder
Letter on
Exploratory Brook Mine Critical Minerals Project
LEXINGTON, Ky., July 29, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Ramaco Resources, Inc.
(NASDAQ: METC, METCB) (“Ramaco” or the “Company”) today released a new initial assessment report from Hatch Associates
Consultants, Inc. (“Hatch”) and an accompanying shareholder letter from Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Randall W. Atkins.
That letter highlights the current status of the Company’s rare earth and critical minerals project in Sheridan, Wyoming.
The Hatch study evaluates a previously announced carbochlorination-based
refining and flowsheet process for the Brook Mine project. It provides a preliminary process definition as well as capital and operating
cost estimates to assess the potential of the Brook Mine critical mineral project. Key findings are highlighted in the shareholder letter.
“The Hatch report and its analysis marks an important milestone
in advancing our vision of building a fully integrated domestic critical minerals platform,” said Mr. Atkins. “We believe the
Brook Mine complex has the potential to become a significant long-term supplier of critical minerals and rare earth products essential
to America’s industrial and technology supply chains.”
The Hatch report and shareholder letter are available on Ramaco’s website
here: https://www.ramacoresources.com. Additional renderings and project-related images are available on the website here: https://www.ramacoresources.com/critical-minerals.
Earlier in July, Ramaco hosted its 5th Annual Ramaco Research Rodeo
(R3) in Sheridan, Wyoming, where there was extensive discussion by industry leaders, researchers, policymakers, and investors related
to critical minerals, advanced carbon products, artificial intelligence, and energy innovation. A video presented during the conference
related to the Brook Mine project can be viewed here: https://ramacoresources.com/carbon-operations/
ABOUT RAMACO RESOURCES
Ramaco Resources, Inc. is an operator and developer of high-quality,
low-cost metallurgical coal in southern West Virginia, and southwestern Virginia and exploring a coal, rare earth and other critical
minerals project in Wyoming. The Company’s executive offices are located in Lexington, Kentucky, with operational offices in Charleston,
West Virginia and Sheridan, Wyoming. The Company currently has four active metallurgical coal mining complexes in Central Appalachia
and one coal mine and rare earth element and other critical mineral exploration stage property near Sheridan, Wyoming (the “Brook
Mine”). The Brook Mine remains an exploration stage property, and no assurance can be given that it will be successfully developed
into a commercial scale mine or that any inferred mineral resources estimated will be converted into higher confidence mineral resources
or eventually mineral reserves. Contiguous to the Brook Mine, the Company operates a carbon research facility related to the potential
production of advanced carbon products and materials from coal. In connection with these activities, it holds a body of more than 70
intellectual property patents, pending applications, exclusive licensing agreements and various trademarks.
News and additional information about Ramaco Resources, including filings
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, are available at https://www.ramacoresources.com. For more information, contact investor
relations at (859) 244-7455.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The Hatch report is a scoping study and, accordingly, all estimates
and projections contained therein are based on limited and incomplete data. Therefore, while the work, results, estimates and projections
may be considered to be generally indicative of the nature and quality of the Project, they are not definitive.
Certain statements contained in this news release constitute “forward-looking
statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements represent
Ramaco Resources’ expectations or beliefs concerning guidance, future events, anticipated revenue, future demand and production levels,
macroeconomic trends, the development of ongoing projects, costs and expectations regarding operating results, and it is possible that
the results described in this news release will not be achieved.
These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties
and other factors, many of which are outside of Ramaco Resources’ control, which could cause actual results to differ materially from
the results discussed in the forward-looking statements.
These factors include, without limitation, unexpected delays in our
current mine development activities, the ability to successfully increase production at our existing met coal complexes in accordance
with the Company’s growth initiatives, failure of our sales commitment counterparties to perform, increased government regulation of coal
in the United States or internationally, the impact of tariffs imposed by the United States and foreign governments, the further decline
of demand for coal in export markets and underperformance of the railroads, the Company’s ability to successfully develop the Brook Mine
REE/CM project, including whether the Company’s exploration target and estimates for such mine are realized, the timing of the initial
production of rare earth concentrates, the development of a pilot and ultimately a full scale commercial processing facility. Mineral
resources are not mineral reserves and do not meet the threshold for reserve modifying factors, such as estimated economic viability,
that would allow for conversion to mineral reserves. There is no certainty that any part of the estimated mineral resources at Brook Mine
will be converted into mineral reserves in the future. Rare earth and critical minerals is a new initiative for us and, as such, has required
and will continue to require us to make significant investments to build out our rare earth capabilities.
Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it
is made, and, except as required by law, Ramaco Resources does not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement,
whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for Ramaco
Resources to predict all such factors. When considering these forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the risk factors and
other cautionary statements found in Ramaco Resources’ filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including
its Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. The risk factors and other factors noted in Ramaco Resources’ SEC filings
could cause its actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement.
POINT OF CONTACT
George Cpin
VP, Finance & Investor Relations
info@ramacometc.com or 859-244-7455
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img1.jpg · Sequence: 5
Binary file (6069 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img1.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img2.jpg · Sequence: 6
Binary file (5420 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img2.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img3.jpg · Sequence: 7
Binary file (1949 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img3.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img4.jpg · Sequence: 8
Binary file (233823 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img4.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img5.jpg · Sequence: 9
Binary file (82365 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img5.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img6.jpg · Sequence: 10
Binary file (50424 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img6.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img7.jpg · Sequence: 11
Binary file (37844 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img7.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img8.jpg · Sequence: 12
Binary file (40087 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img8.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img9.jpg · Sequence: 13
Binary file (21721 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img9.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img10.jpg · Sequence: 14
Binary file (46822 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img10.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img11.jpg · Sequence: 15
Binary file (330731 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img11.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img12.jpg · Sequence: 16
Binary file (68746 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img12.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img13.jpg · Sequence: 17
Binary file (41636 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img13.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img14.jpg · Sequence: 18
Binary file (38936 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img14.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img15.jpg · Sequence: 19
Binary file (32044 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img15.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img16.jpg · Sequence: 20
Binary file (24646 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img16.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img17.jpg · Sequence: 21
Binary file (52332 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img17.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img18.jpg · Sequence: 22
Binary file (52129 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img18.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img19.jpg · Sequence: 23
Binary file (31530 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img19.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img20.jpg · Sequence: 24
Binary file (55201 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img20.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img21.jpg · Sequence: 25
Binary file (40045 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img21.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img22.jpg · Sequence: 26
Binary file (39428 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img22.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img23.jpg · Sequence: 27
Binary file (65581 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img23.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img24.jpg · Sequence: 28
Binary file (42697 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img24.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img25.jpg · Sequence: 29
Binary file (690897 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img25.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img26.jpg · Sequence: 30
Binary file (32102 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img26.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img27.jpg · Sequence: 31
Binary file (108936 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img27.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img28.jpg · Sequence: 32
Binary file (286804 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img28.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img29.jpg · Sequence: 33
Binary file (4733 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img29.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img30.jpg · Sequence: 34
Binary file (4175 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img30.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img31.jpg · Sequence: 35
Binary file (4455 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img31.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img32.jpg · Sequence: 36
Binary file (2548 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img32.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img33.jpg · Sequence: 37
Binary file (2472 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img33.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img34.jpg · Sequence: 38
Binary file (6057 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img34.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img35.jpg · Sequence: 39
Binary file (4659 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img35.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img36.jpg · Sequence: 40
Binary file (4500 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img36.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img37.jpg · Sequence: 41
Binary file (4605 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img37.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img38.jpg · Sequence: 42
Binary file (4471 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img38.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img39.jpg · Sequence: 43
Binary file (5215 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img39.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img40.jpg · Sequence: 44
Binary file (5646 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img40.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img41.jpg · Sequence: 45
Binary file (4460 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img41.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img42.jpg · Sequence: 46
Binary file (4250 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img42.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img43.jpg · Sequence: 47
Binary file (5031 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img43.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img44.jpg · Sequence: 48
Binary file (4197 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img44.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img45.jpg · Sequence: 49
Binary file (4053 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img45.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img46.jpg · Sequence: 50
Binary file (3668 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img46.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img47.jpg · Sequence: 51
Binary file (3736 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img47.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img48.jpg · Sequence: 52
Binary file (4104 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img48.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img49.jpg · Sequence: 53
Binary file (3801 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img49.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img50.jpg · Sequence: 54
Binary file (3724 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img50.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img51.jpg · Sequence: 55
Binary file (3527 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img51.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img52.jpg · Sequence: 56
Binary file (3125 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img52.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img53.jpg · Sequence: 57
Binary file (4159 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img53.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img54.jpg · Sequence: 58
Binary file (4401 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img54.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img55.jpg · Sequence: 59
Binary file (4138 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img55.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img56.jpg · Sequence: 60
Binary file (3933 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img56.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img57.jpg · Sequence: 61
Binary file (4034 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img57.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img58.jpg · Sequence: 62
Binary file (3929 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img58.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img59.jpg · Sequence: 63
Binary file (3871 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img59.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img60.jpg · Sequence: 64
Binary file (4642 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img60.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img61.jpg · Sequence: 65
Binary file (4041 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img61.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img62.jpg · Sequence: 66
Binary file (3653 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img62.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img63.jpg · Sequence: 67
Binary file (3248 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img63.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img64.jpg · Sequence: 68
Binary file (4993 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img64.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img65.jpg · Sequence: 69
Binary file (4805 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img65.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img66.jpg · Sequence: 70
Binary file (6534 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img66.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img67.jpg · Sequence: 71
Binary file (4187 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img67.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img68.jpg · Sequence: 72
Binary file (3558 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img68.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img69.jpg · Sequence: 73
Binary file (3913 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img69.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img70.jpg · Sequence: 74
Binary file (3633 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img70.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img71.jpg · Sequence: 75
Binary file (3597 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img71.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-1img72.jpg · Sequence: 76
Binary file (3924 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-1img72.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-2img1.jpg · Sequence: 77
Binary file (4445 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-2img1.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-2img2.jpg · Sequence: 78
Binary file (348264 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-2img2.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-2img3.jpg · Sequence: 79
Binary file (225140 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-2img3.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-2img4.jpg · Sequence: 80
Binary file (127262 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-2img4.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-2img5.jpg · Sequence: 81
Binary file (176309 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-2img5.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-2img6.jpg · Sequence: 82
Binary file (52911 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-2img6.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-2img7.jpg · Sequence: 83
Binary file (194145 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-2img7.jpg
GRAPHIC
GRAPHIC
Filename: ea029953301_ex99-3img1.jpg · Sequence: 84
Binary file (4445 bytes)
Download ea029953301_ex99-3img1.jpg
XML — IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT
XML
Filename: R1.htm · Sequence: 90
v3.26.1
Cover
Jul. 28, 2026
Document Type
8-K
Amendment Flag
false
Document Period End Date
Jul. 28, 2026
Entity File Number
001-38003
Entity Registrant Name
Ramaco Resources, Inc.
Entity Central Index Key
0001687187
Entity Tax Identification Number
38-4018838
Entity Incorporation, State or Country Code
DE
Entity Address, Address Line One
250 West Main Street
Entity Address, Address Line Two
Suite 1900
Entity Address, City or Town
Lexington
Entity Address, State or Province
KY
Entity Address, Postal Zip Code
40507
City Area Code
859
Local Phone Number
244-7455
Written Communications
false
Soliciting Material
false
Pre-commencement Tender Offer
false
Pre-commencement Issuer Tender Offer
false
Entity Emerging Growth Company
false
Class A Common Stock,
Title of 12(b) Security
Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par value
Trading Symbol
METC
Security Exchange Name
NASDAQ
Class B Common Stock,
Title of 12(b) Security
Class B Common Stock, $0.01 par value
Trading Symbol
METCB
Security Exchange Name
NASDAQ
8.375% Senior Notes due 2029
Title of 12(b) Security
8.375% Senior Notes due 2029
Trading Symbol
METCZ
Security Exchange Name
NASDAQ
8.250% Senior Notes due 2030
Title of 12(b) Security
8.250% Senior Notes due 2030
Trading Symbol
METCI
Security Exchange Name
NASDAQ
X
- Definition
Boolean flag that is true when the XBRL content amends previously-filed or accepted submission.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details
Name:
dei_AmendmentFlag
Namespace Prefix:
dei_
Data Type:
xbrli:booleanItemType
Balance Type:
na
Period Type:
duration
X
- Definition
Area code of city
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details
Name:
dei_CityAreaCode
Namespace Prefix:
dei_
Data Type:
xbrli:normalizedStringItemType
Balance Type:
na
Period Type:
duration
X
- Definition
For the EDGAR submission types of Form 8-K: the date of the report, the date of the earliest event reported; for the EDGAR submission types of Form N-1A: the filing date; for all other submission types: the end of the reporting or transition period. The format of the date is YYYY-MM-DD.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details
Name:
dei_DocumentPeriodEndDate
Namespace Prefix:
dei_
Data Type:
xbrli:dateItemType
Balance Type:
na
Period Type:
duration
X
- Definition
The type of document being provided (such as 10-K, 10-Q, 485BPOS, etc). The document type is limited to the same value as the supporting SEC submission type, or the word 'Other'.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details
Name:
dei_DocumentType
Namespace Prefix:
dei_
Data Type:
dei:submissionTypeItemType
Balance Type:
na
Period Type:
duration
X
- Definition
Address Line 1 such as Attn, Building Name, Street Name
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details
Name:
dei_EntityAddressAddressLine1
Namespace Prefix:
dei_
Data Type:
xbrli:normalizedStringItemType
Balance Type:
na
Period Type:
duration
X
- Definition
Address Line 2 such as Street or Suite number
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details
Name:
dei_EntityAddressAddressLine2
Namespace Prefix:
dei_
Data Type:
xbrli:normalizedStringItemType
Balance Type:
na
Period Type:
duration
X
- Definition
Name of the City or Town
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details
Name:
dei_EntityAddressCityOrTown
Namespace Prefix:
dei_
Data Type:
xbrli:normalizedStringItemType
Balance Type:
na
Period Type:
duration
X
- Definition
Code for the postal or zip code
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details
Name:
dei_EntityAddressPostalZipCode
Namespace Prefix:
dei_
Data Type:
xbrli:normalizedStringItemType
Balance Type:
na
Period Type:
duration
X
- Definition
Name of the state or province.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details
Name:
dei_EntityAddressStateOrProvince
Namespace Prefix:
dei_
Data Type:
dei:stateOrProvinceItemType
Balance Type:
na
Period Type:
duration
X
- Definition
A unique 10-digit SEC-issued value to identify entities that have filed disclosures with the SEC. It is commonly abbreviated as CIK.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Exchange Act
-Number 240
-Section 12
-Subsection b-2
+ Details
Name:
dei_EntityCentralIndexKey
Namespace Prefix:
dei_
Data Type:
dei:centralIndexKeyItemType
Balance Type:
na
Period Type:
duration
X
- Definition
Indicate if registrant meets the emerging growth company criteria.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Exchange Act
-Number 240
-Section 12
-Subsection b-2
+ Details
Name:
dei_EntityEmergingGrowthCompany
Namespace Prefix:
dei_
Data Type:
xbrli:booleanItemType
Balance Type:
na
Period Type:
duration
X
- Definition
Commission file number. The field allows up to 17 characters. The prefix may contain 1-3 digits, the sequence number may contain 1-8 digits, the optional suffix may contain 1-4 characters, and the fields are separated with a hyphen.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details
Name:
dei_EntityFileNumber
Namespace Prefix:
dei_
Data Type:
dei:fileNumberItemType
Balance Type:
na
Period Type:
duration
X
- Definition
Two-character EDGAR code representing the state or country of incorporation.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details
Name:
dei_EntityIncorporationStateCountryCode
Namespace Prefix:
dei_
Data Type:
dei:edgarStateCountryItemType
Balance Type:
na
Period Type:
duration
X
- Definition
The exact name of the entity filing the report as specified in its charter, which is required by forms filed with the SEC.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Exchange Act
-Number 240
-Section 12
-Subsection b-2
+ Details
Name:
dei_EntityRegistrantName
Namespace Prefix:
dei_
Data Type:
xbrli:normalizedStringItemType
Balance Type:
na
Period Type:
duration
X
- Definition
The Tax Identification Number (TIN), also known as an Employer Identification Number (EIN), is a unique 9-digit value assigned by the IRS.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Exchange Act
-Number 240
-Section 12
-Subsection b-2
+ Details
Name:
dei_EntityTaxIdentificationNumber
Namespace Prefix:
dei_
Data Type:
dei:employerIdItemType
Balance Type:
na
Period Type:
duration
X
- Definition
Local phone number for entity.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details
Name:
dei_LocalPhoneNumber
Namespace Prefix:
dei_
Data Type:
xbrli:normalizedStringItemType
Balance Type:
na
Period Type:
duration
X
- Definition
Boolean flag that is true when the Form 8-K filing is intended to satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant as pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Exchange Act
-Number 240
-Section 13e
-Subsection 4c
+ Details
Name:
dei_PreCommencementIssuerTenderOffer
Namespace Prefix:
dei_
Data Type:
xbrli:booleanItemType
Balance Type:
na
Period Type:
duration
X
- Definition
Boolean flag that is true when the Form 8-K filing is intended to satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant as pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Exchange Act
-Number 240
-Section 14d
-Subsection 2b
+ Details
Name:
dei_PreCommencementTenderOffer
Namespace Prefix:
dei_
Data Type:
xbrli:booleanItemType
Balance Type:
na
Period Type:
duration
X
- Definition
Title of a 12(b) registered security.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Exchange Act
-Number 240
-Section 12
-Subsection b
+ Details
Name:
dei_Security12bTitle
Namespace Prefix:
dei_
Data Type:
dei:securityTitleItemType
Balance Type:
na
Period Type:
duration
X
- Definition
Name of the Exchange on which a security is registered.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Exchange Act
-Number 240
-Section 12
-Subsection d1-1
+ Details
Name:
dei_SecurityExchangeName
Namespace Prefix:
dei_
Data Type:
dei:edgarExchangeCodeItemType
Balance Type:
na
Period Type:
duration
X
- Definition
Boolean flag that is true when the Form 8-K filing is intended to satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant as soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Exchange Act
-Number 240
-Section 14a
-Subsection 12
+ Details
Name:
dei_SolicitingMaterial
Namespace Prefix:
dei_
Data Type:
xbrli:booleanItemType
Balance Type:
na
Period Type:
duration
X
- Definition
Trading symbol of an instrument as listed on an exchange.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details
Name:
dei_TradingSymbol
Namespace Prefix:
dei_
Data Type:
dei:tradingSymbolItemType
Balance Type:
na
Period Type:
duration
X
- Definition
Boolean flag that is true when the Form 8-K filing is intended to satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant as written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher SEC
-Name Securities Act
-Number 230
-Section 425
+ Details
Name:
dei_WrittenCommunications
Namespace Prefix:
dei_
Data Type:
xbrli:booleanItemType
Balance Type:
na
Period Type:
duration
X
- Details
Name:
us-gaap_StatementClassOfStockAxis=METC_ClassCommonStockMember
Namespace Prefix:
Data Type:
na
Balance Type:
Period Type:
X
- Details
Name:
us-gaap_StatementClassOfStockAxis=METC_ClassBCommonStockMember
Namespace Prefix:
Data Type:
na
Balance Type:
Period Type:
X
- Details
Name:
us-gaap_StatementClassOfStockAxis=METC_Sec8.375SeniorNotesDue2029Member
Namespace Prefix:
Data Type:
na
Balance Type:
Period Type:
X
- Details
Name:
us-gaap_StatementClassOfStockAxis=METC_Sec8.250SeniorNotesDue2030Member
Namespace Prefix:
Data Type:
na
Balance Type:
Period Type: